[cdi-dev] InjectionPoint when injecting into Decorators

Jozef Hartinger jharting at redhat.com
Tue Jul 8 03:32:43 EDT 2014

This was supposed to be fixed by https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-78 
(see https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/21/files) but it seems the 
proposed changes never actually got to the specification although the 
issue is marked as resolved :-/


On 07/08/2014 08:58 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
> I struggle with a few TCK tests which assume that in Decorators and 
> Interceptors you can have an @Inject ct which has a valid InjectionPoint.
> But I cannot find in the spec how this is supposed to work.
> 5.5.7 defines in which situations the CDI container must create an 
> InjectionPoint:
> ----
> An instance of InjectionPoint may represent:
> . an injected field or a parameter of a bean constructor, initializer 
> method, producer method, disposer method or observer method, or
> . an instance obtained dynamically using Instance.get().
> ----
> But if you e.g. look at
>     @Inject
>     public OrderedEventDeliveryDecorator(@Delegate Event<T> delegate, 
> InjectionPoint ip, BeanManager manager,
> OrderedEventDeliveryExtension extension)
> then this does not fit any requirement imo. Because the Decorator is a 
> dependent bean on the decorated contextual instance.
> Thus it's 'internal' and does not have any InjectionPoint. This would 
> be different if you would @Inject the Decorator into some other bean...
> The TCK test in question is ComplexEventDecoratorTest#testOrderedEvents
> Did I overlook something?
> LieGrue,
> strub
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20140708/cb19ff7c/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the cdi-dev mailing list