[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-470) Clarify @Vetoed on recursive package

Martin Kouba (JIRA) issues at jboss.org
Mon Sep 15 03:32:02 EDT 2014

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002175#comment-13002175 ] 

Martin Kouba commented on CDI-470:

Yes, something like this sounds reasonable. Right now, you can only use exclude filters in beans.xml or a portable extension and {{ProcessAnnotatedType.veto()}}. But it's not that practical. What I'm trying to say is that it's not a perfect match to use an annotation on a package to affect the subpackages.

> Clarify @Vetoed on recursive package
> ------------------------------------
>                 Key: CDI-470
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-470
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Clarification
>          Components: Beans
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.Final
>            Reporter: Antonio Goncalves
> It's not clear in the specification is {{@Vetoed}} only apply to the current package or subpackages as well. This has been addressed on [CDI-299] but not solved. Either, we make it clearer in the spec that it only addresses the current package and not subpackages, or we could have a boolean, such as {{recursive}} :
> {code:title=package-info.java}
> @Vetoed(recursive=true)
> package my.parent.package;
> import javax.enterprise.inject.Vetoed;
> {code}

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

More information about the cdi-dev mailing list