[cdi-dev] Controlling the Interceptor chain
pmuir at redhat.com
Tue Sep 23 05:18:06 EDT 2014
Yes, the workshops will discuss this. However note that quite a lot of interceptors are shared between Java EE specs, so not under our direct control. So changes in how interceptors work need to be addressed in the interceptors spec…
On 23 Sep 2014, at 04:38, Mohan Radhakrishnan <radhakrishnan.mohan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Pete,
> What is the general roadmap for the AOP and Interceptor section of CDI 2.0 ? Is that what the workshops are going to figure out ?
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Mohan,
> This is probably better discussed on the Interceptors expert group. Not sure how that is functioning this time around, will try to check.
> On 20 Sep 2014, at 16:21, Mohan Radhakrishnan <radhakrishnan.mohan at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have read the older CDI and interceptor spec. but not very thoroughly.
> > Does control over how methods are intercepted using the following rules make it more useful ?
> > 1. Intercept only the top-level call and not recursive calls.
> > 2. Intercept and decorate "call 1" if it happens within "call 2" and not "call 3". Specify one type of combination of interceptions but not the other.
> > I hope these are not orthogonal to the spec. They are features of AOP I know.
> > Thanks,
> > Mohan
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdi-dev mailing list
> > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cdi-dev