[cdi-dev] CDI 2.0 release is official

Antoine Sabot-Durand antoine at sabot-durand.net
Mon Jul 6 12:28:05 EDT 2015


Arjan,

I posted an message on their forum two years ago to know their plan for CDI
1.1 support. Still waiting for the answer... I changed the sentence in "the
two main implementations".

Antoine

Le sam. 4 juil. 2015 à 20:15, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
>
> On Saturday, July 4, 2015, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Candi implements CDI 1.0 and never provided solution for java SE. To my
>> knowledge that don't have plan for CDI 1.2 or 2.0.
>
>
> I noticed that Resin (which uses CanDI as its CDI implementation) is still
> active. I would assume that eventually they'll want to move to EE 7 and not
> stay on EE 6 "forever". But I'll ask in the Resin mailing group.
>
> Anyway, maybe the sentence would be a little more correct if it was
> something like:
>
> "Since the beginning two of the three early implementations (JBoss Weld
> and Apache OpenWebBeans) proposed proprietary solutions to use CDI in Java
> SE."
>
> Kind regards,
> Arjan Tijms
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Antoine
>> Le sam. 4 juil. 2015 à 14:02, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've got one comment:
>>>
>>> >Since the beginning both implementations (JBoss Weld and Apache
>>> OpenWebBeans) proposed proprietary solutions to use CDI in Java SE.
>>>
>>> Aren't there 3 implementations really? CanDI implements CDI too, doesn't
>>> it?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Arjan Tijms
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand
>>> <antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
>>> > Of course it's CDI 2.0 EDR1 ;). <bad faith>it was a test to see if
>>> someone
>>> > was actually reading </bad faith>
>>> >
>>> > Antoine
>>> >
>>> > Le 3 juil. 2015 à 15:41, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>> >
>>> > Very nice! (though the email subject is a little misleading)
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:12 AM Antoine Sabot-Durand
>>> > <antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi guys,
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> You can communicate on it or give me your feedback on the post
>>> >>
>>> >> http://cdi-spec.org/news/2015/07/03/CDI-2_0-EDR1-released/
>>> >>
>>> >> Antoine
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> cdi-dev mailing list
>>> >> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>> >>
>>> >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
>>> the
>>> >> code under the Apache License, Version 2
>>> >> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>>> ideas
>>> >> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
>>> intellectual
>>> >> property rights inherent in such information.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > cdi-dev mailing list
>>> > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>> >
>>> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
>>> the code
>>> > under the Apache License, Version 2
>>> > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
>>> > provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
>>> intellectual
>>> > property rights inherent in such information.
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150706/be2116ce/attachment.html 


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list