[cdi-dev] [VOTE] support of implicit bean archive under Java SE

[John D. Ament]

Ok then -1 from me.
The reason I say -1 is because using a boolean is too restrictive.

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:29 PM Antoine Sabot-Durand <
antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:

> Yes. that's the reason why this problem was raised by Jozef: having to
> scan all jars can be very resource consuming.
>
> Le mer. 3 juin 2015 à 17:19, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Just to clarify, are you saying that by default, only JARs that contain
>> META-INF/beans.xml will be scanned.
>> when you set this parameter to true, all JARs are scanned?
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:14 AM Antoine Sabot-Durand <
>> antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>> Yesterday during the meeting we had a discussion about implicit bean
>>> archive support under Java SE.
>>> The idea is to have it disabled by default and provide a way to activate
>>> it thru parameter "javax.enterprise.inject.scan.implicit=true”on command
>>> line or in the parameter map of the initialize method.
>>> Details of the discussion and points of people pro and against this
>>> support can be found in meeting log :
>>>
>>>
>>> http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/cdi-dev/2015/cdi-dev.2015-06-02-16.01.log.html
>>>
>>> I’d like to call for a vote regarding the support of implicit bean
>>> archive under Java SE.
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for 72 hrs. Answer +1 (yes), 0 (don’t care), -1
>>> (no) to this mail to vote.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>>
>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
>>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
>>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
>>> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150603/11c65a8c/attachment.html