[cdi-dev] Contexts behavior in SE and Async Event for EDR1

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Looks like you miss the main point. The usage is not portable most of the
time. Cant we make it portable?
Le 19 juin 2015 13:57, "Jozef Hartinger" <jharting at redhat.com> a écrit :

> I agree with Martin and Mark. @RequestScoped already is used as a
> general purpose task-bound scope. This covers, but is not limited to,
> HTTP request. On the other hand @SessionScoped and @ConversationScoped
> are only defined to be available for HTTP requests.
>
> On 06/19/2015 08:43 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
> > Jozef, Martin,
> >
> >
> > What is your POV on that ?
> >
> > Antoine
> >
> >
> >> Le 18 juin 2015 à 20:37, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> a écrit :
> >>
> >> 1.) The whole point is that @RequestScoped is NOT a web context!
> >>
> >> Otherwise it would _not_ be active in JMS etc…
> >> And that was not an accident but intentional.
> >>
> >> 2.) And no, different async threads will _never_ get the same request
> context…
> >>
> >>
> >> 3.) no @RequestScoped is a sub-part of a @ThreadScoped. Otherwise you
> would get the same context for 2 JMS invocations which get (randomly)
> executed on the same worker thread. Got me?
> >>
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >>> Am 18.06.2015 um 15:13 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau at gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> I wouldn't activate any "web" scope by default, in particular for
> async events where I think most of the time it will not be used. Next
> feature request will be to inherit the scope between async threads....and
> here I guess we agree it will not go very far.
> >>>
> >>> Side note: using request scope where actually a thread scope is needed
> is a pain, maybe time to add a thread scoped with an accessible manual
> activation. Would make "batches", "timers" etc easy to impl/integrate.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
> >>>
> >>> 2015-06-18 15:10 GMT+02:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <
> antoine at sabot-durand.net>:
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>>
> >>> We should finally decide how to manage normal scope context (other
> than application context ) in SE and during Async Event for EDR1.
> >>>
> >>> Having only RequestContext active during async event  as Martin
> suggest in the PR makes sense and would be consistent with its behavior
> during async EJB call.
> >>>
> >>> Mark asked twice to activate Request Context all the time in SE
> (making it a new Application Context). I’m not found of it, but I’ml not
> the only one to decide here.
> >>>
> >>> What is you feeling about this ?
> >>>
> >>> Antoine
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cdi-dev mailing list
> >>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>>
> >>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
> the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cdi-dev mailing list
> >>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>>
> >>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
> the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cdi-dev mailing list
> >> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>
> >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150619/2922c2f8/attachment.html