[cdi-dev] Fwd: bean archives

[Emily Jiang]

I agree with Mark. I am confused about section 5 and section 12. Weld-2
leaves the work of specifying the bean archive to the integrator. I am
wondering how the new version of app server using Weld-2 can pass the CDI
1.1/1.2 CTS at all if the integrator creates its bean archives based on
section 12.

I am guessing CDI 1.1/1.2 cts, the updated version of CDI 1.0(?),  is based
on section 5. Can someone confirm? The spec needs to be updated to remove
the conflict between section 5 and section 12.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Emily Jiang <emijiang6 at googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, May 2, 2015 at 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] bean archives
To: Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>


I agree with Mark. I am confused about section 5 and section 12. Weld-2
leaves the work of specifying the bean archive to the integrator. I am
wondering how the new version of app server using Weld-2 can pass the CDI
1.1/1.2 CTS at all if the integrator creates its bean archives based on
section 12.

I am guessing CDI 1.1/1.2 cts, the updated version of CDI 1.0(?),  is based
on section 5. Can someone confirm? The spec needs to be updated to remove
the conflict between section 5 and section 12.

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> wrote:

> Actually the rules are still not clear. Section 5 and 12 contradict each
> other. The EE6 RI, JBossAS6 and TomEE and WAS did behave like in section 5
> (1 BDA per ee-module) whereas Weld-2 behaves like in section 12.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>   On Saturday, 2 May 2015, 10:13, Antoine Sabot-Durand <
> antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Emily,
>
> The rules) apply to each jar (archive). There is no merging, thus an app
> can contain three types of archives :
> Non bean archives,
> Implicit bean archives,
> Explicit bean archives.
>
> Antoine Sabot-Durand
>
>
> Le 1 mai 2015 à 23:03, Emily Jiang <emijiang6 at googlemail.com> a écrit :
>
>
> I have a question on bean archives.
>
> For the jars under web-inf\lib, are they individual bean archives or they
> should be merged   with web-inf\classes files and use the beans.xml under
> web-inf\ to form one bean archive?
>
>
> If they are merged together to form one bean archive, what will happen if
> they have their own beans.xml under Meta-inf dir?
>
> Below is the what spec says, but it does not mention the jar under
> web-inf\lib. The spec should make this situation clear.
>
> In the CDI1.2 spec:
> When determining which archives are bean archives, the container must
> consider:
> • Library jars, EJB jars or application client jars
> • The WEB-INF/classes directory of a war
> • Directories in the JVM classpath
> The container is not required to support application client jar bean
> archives.
> A Java EE container is required by the Java EE specification to support
> Java EE modules. Other
> containers may or may not provide support for war, EJB jar or rar bean
> archives.
> The beans.xml file must be named:
> • META-INF/beans.xml , or,
> • in a war, WEB-INF/beans.xml or WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/beans.xml.
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Emily
> =================
> Emily Jiang
> ejiang at apache.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
>
>


-- 
Thanks
Emily
=================
Emily Jiang
ejiang at apache.org



-- 
Thanks
Emily
=================
Emily Jiang
ejiang at apache.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150502/9bec97b8/attachment-0001.html