[cdi-dev] CDI-26 feedback

Jozef Hartinger jharting at redhat.com
Thu May 28 02:18:21 EDT 2015

The fact that the spec does not require parallel container support does 
not imply there is always a 1:1 relationship. An implementation or a 
future version of the spec are free to support this. I am OK with 
dealing with this post EDR1.

On 05/27/2015 02:57 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> 2. EDR1 infers that only a single CDI instance is associated to a 
> CDIProvider (so they're 1:1).  We can move this after EDR1.

More information about the cdi-dev mailing list