[cdi-dev] CDI-26 feedback
Jozef Hartinger
jharting at redhat.com
Thu May 28 02:18:21 EDT 2015
The fact that the spec does not require parallel container support does
not imply there is always a 1:1 relationship. An implementation or a
future version of the spec are free to support this. I am OK with
dealing with this post EDR1.
On 05/27/2015 02:57 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> 2. EDR1 infers that only a single CDI instance is associated to a
> CDIProvider (so they're 1:1). We can move this after EDR1.
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list