[cdi-dev] [PROPOSAL] further align CDI and EJB

[Sven Linstaedt]

+1 for splitting the classpath scanning and all AnnotatedXXX /
ProcessAnnotatedType type parsing/overriding from the CDI in an own spec,
so other specs (not only EJB) may rely on it.

2015-11-11 20:54 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau at gmail.com>:

> Hi Mark,
>
> few points on that topic:
>
> - let the EJB container reuse AnnotatedType (ie even add @Stateless
> through an Extension): +1
> - veto an EJB as a whole and not only in CDI side - ie @Schedule is
> ignored on EJB side of thing: I'm quite mitigated. Looks tempting but it
> would break the compatibility with extsing apps I fear since veto is 100% a
> CDI thing today.
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-11-11 11:47 GMT-08:00 Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> We already do a decent amount of ‚side-by-side‘ handling in EJB and CDI.
>> But there are still many aready where we could really move together much
>> closer.
>>
>> E.g. the CDI spec defines that @Vetoed on EJBs must get accounted by the
>> EJB container. But what happens with ProcessAnnotatedType#veto(). This one
>> is not defined that clearly I fear.
>>
>> What if we (of course together with the EJB spec group) define that the
>> EJB container must create the EJBs according to the effective AnnotatedType
>> coming out after ProcessAnnotatedType? This would define that EJBs can also
>> get modified via CDI Extensions. Some container do that already.
>> The benefit of explicitly writing this down would obviously be that we
>> would allow EJB to fully utilize the power of CDI Extensions in a portable
>> way.
>>
>> Any objections, any ideas, any howtos?
>>
>> Let the ideas roll ;)
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
>> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20151112/b6ef581f/attachment.html