[cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-616 resolution
stephan at knitelius.com
Wed Aug 3 07:53:14 EDT 2016
(b) - apps defining transient inject points in passivatable scopes are
broken to start with.
On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 at 13:05 John Ament <john.ament at spartasystems.com> wrote:
> My vote is (a). The current state is that this kind of works, and we
> would be breaking existing apps by throwing an exception.
> *From:* cdi-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org <cdi-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org>
> on behalf of Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 3, 2016 5:21:04 AM
> *To:* cdi-dev
> *Subject:* [cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-616 resolution
> Hi all,
> During yesterday(s meeting we discussed how to solve CDI-616 issue.
> 2 options are possible but we didn't find an agreement, so the best
> solution here would be to vote.
> Options are:
> a) Do nothing about injection in transient fields (todays behaviour) but
> add a clarification in the spec saying that using them is not supported.
> b) Throw an exception at boot time if a transient field is an injection
> To vote, just answer to this mail with the letter of your vote. Vote will
> last 72 hrs from the hour of this mail.
> Thank you,
> NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential,
> proprietary, and/or privileged information which should be treated
> accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
> sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this message, and destroy all
> physical and electronic copies. Thank you.
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cdi-dev