[cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

+0 since alternative/interceptors are not aligned. On a user perspective I
find it easier is the sorting is the natural integer one but any dev knows
the ordinal ordering too so not a big deal IMHO.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2016-12-08 11:45 GMT+01:00 Matej Novotny <manovotn at redhat.com>:

> +0
>
> Don't really care. Since it's not unified across CDI, having it one way or
> the other doesn't really make difference to me.
>
> Matej
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
> > To: "CDI Java EE Specification" <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:29:11 AM
> > Subject: [cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As already explained in a previous mail [1], some of us would like
> change the
> > current order of events to make the highest @Priority value first and the
> > lowest last. This change would be an alinement on how @Alternative work
> > (highest value being the first candidate).
> >
> > If you agree to the change (highest to lowest) vote +1, if you disagree
> -1
> > and don't care 0. If you want to discuss thread is always open on [1] but
> > time is running out.
> >
> > Vote will end Monday at 12:00 pm CET.
> >
> > Thanks for your participation.
> >
> > Antoine
> >
> > [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2016-November/009330.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdi-dev mailing list
> > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >
> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code
> > under the Apache License, Version 2
> > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> > provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual
> > property rights inherent in such information.
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/
> licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list,
> the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights
> inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20161208/76068ff7/attachment.html