[cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-527 / PR 271 allow proxying of classes with non-private final methods
antoine at sabot-durand.net
Tue Feb 9 11:37:28 EST 2016
Le mar. 9 févr. 2016 à 17:36, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
a écrit :
> Hi all,
> There have been a lot of discussion around CDI-527 in the last weeks:
> Mark proposed a PR:
> But we don't agree on adding this feature to the spec.
> This vote is to decide if we should add this feature at the spec level
> now, or not.
> Should we vote this feature down, that won't mean it will be completely
> dropped: it could be implemented as non portable feature in both Spec or
> even be included as experimental feature in the spec (in annexes) as
> describe in the PR comments
> Vote starts now, only vote from EG members are binding (but you can give
> your opinion if not part of the EG) and will last 72 hours.
> You vote with the following values:
> +1 : I'm favorable for adding this feature in the spec
> -1 : I'm against adding this feature in the spec
> 0 : I don't care
> Thank you for your attention and your vote.
> Antoine Sabot-Durand
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cdi-dev