[cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-527 / PR 271 allow proxying of classes with non-private final methods

[Mark Struberg]

+1

This is a real world problem and it would imo be a pitty to not have it in the spec in a portable way.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 09.02.2016 um 17:36 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> There have been a lot of discussion around CDI-527 in the last weeks:
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-527
> 
> Mark proposed a PR:
> https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/271
> 
> But we don't agree on adding this feature to the spec.
> This vote is to decide if we should add this feature at the spec level now, or not.
> Should we vote this feature down, that won't mean it will be completely dropped: it could be implemented as non portable feature in both Spec or even be included as experimental feature in the spec (in annexes) as describe in the PR comments
> Vote starts now, only vote from EG members are binding (but you can give your opinion if not part of the EG) and will last 72 hours.
> 
> You vote with the following values:
> +1 : I'm favorable for adding this feature in the spec
> -1 : I'm against adding this feature in the spec
> 0 : I don't care
> 
> Thank you for your attention and your vote.
> 
> Antoine Sabot-Durand
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> 
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.