[cdi-dev] [VOTE] Name the class that can start/stop contexts

Werner Keil werner.keil at gmail.com
Mon Jul 18 09:36:51 EDT 2016


Seems the vote got swamped among many other messages both here and in my
mailbox;-O

The arguments leading towards the winning name sound good and logical, so
that would be my vote, too.

Werner


On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, <cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org> wrote:

> Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to
>         cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         cdi-dev-owner at lists.jboss.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: [VOTE] Name the class that can start/stop contexts
>       (John D. Ament)
>    2. ManageableContext hierarchy (John D. Ament)
>    3. Passed: cdi-spec/cdi#22 (2.0-EDR2 - 5b77f45) (Travis CI)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 02:13:04 +0000
> From: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] [VOTE] Name the class that can start/stop
>         contexts
> To: Emily Jiang <EMIJIANG at uk.ibm.com>,  Antoine Sabot-Durand
>         <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
> Cc: cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAOqetn_E0u6HCOyb5mm7hv-NRqxBKjwykz7v1YW0ynvYxtZPBw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> All,
>
> Thanks for those who voted.
>
> 2 votes for ManageableContext
> 1 vote for ManagedContext
> 1 vote for UserManagedContext
>
> Therefore I'm declaring the winner ManageableContext.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 6:23 PM Emily Jiang <EMIJIANG at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > We are trying to find a better name than UnManagedContext.
> >
> > ManagedContext is surely opposite to the option UnManagedContext:o.
> >
> > ManagableContext fits well with AlternableContext. In addition,
> > ManagableContext should be managed by others, which is the same as
> > UserManagedContext and it is shorter.
> >
> > Hence, +1 for ManagableContext.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Emily
> > ===========================
> > Emily Jiang
> > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
> >
> > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > Phone:  +44 (0)1962 816278  Internal: 246278
> >
> > Email: emijiang at uk.ibm.com
> > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM at IBMGB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:        Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
> > To:        Matej Novotny <manovotn at redhat.com>, "John D. Ament" <
> > john.d.ament at gmail.com>,
> > Cc:        cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > Date:        11/07/2016 15:12
> > Subject:        Re: [cdi-dev] [VOTE] Name the class that can start/stop
> > contexts
> > Sent by:        cdi-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 for UserManagedContext, it says clearly that user is in charge of
> > managing the context.
> > ManageableContext is ok as fallback to me but the fact the the context is
> > manageable does not says anything about who has the responsibility to
> > manage it.
> >
> >
> > Le lun. 11 juil. 2016 ? 11:02, Matej Novotny <*manovotn at redhat.com*
> > <manovotn at redhat.com>> a ?crit :
> > +1 for ManageableContext
> >
> > Personally I would still have UnmanagedContext, but since that seems
> > ambiguous (as does ManagedContext),
> > I chose ManageableContext.
> >
> > Matej
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "John D. Ament" <*john.d.ament at gmail.com* <
> john.d.ament at gmail.com>
> > >
> > > To: *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 2:50:23 AM
> > > Subject: [cdi-dev] [VOTE] Name the class that can start/stop contexts
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > It seems like one of the remaining issues with CDI-30 is the name for
> the
> > > class for the context management. This name isn't permanent, we can
> > change
> > > after EDR2, but not after final.
> > >
> > > Here's the proposed renames for "UnmanagedContext":
> > >
> > > - ManagedContext
> > > - ManageableContext
> > > - ProgrammaticContext
> > > - ExternallyManagedContext
> > > - UserManagedContext
> > >
> > > Please respond back with your vote, I'll leave this open for 3 days ( I
> > > believe its Monday morning in central Europe), so I'll close it
> Thursday
> > > morning.
> > >
> > > Reference:
> > >
> > *
> http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/cdi-dev/2016/cdi-dev.2016-07-07-16.03.log.html*
> > <
> http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/cdi-dev/2016/cdi-dev.2016-07-07-16.03.log.html
> >
> > >
> > > - John
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cdi-dev mailing list
> > > *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > > *https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev*
> > <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
> > >
> > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> > code
> > > under the Apache License, Version 2
> > > (*http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html*
> > <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>). For all other ideas
> > > provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> > intellectual
> > > property rights inherent in such information.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdi-dev mailing list
> > *cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org* <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > *https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev*
> > <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
> >
> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> > code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> > *http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html*
> > <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>). For all other ideas
> > provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> > intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdi-dev mailing list
> > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >
> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> > code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> > provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> > intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> > 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160715/7cfdde8c/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 22:38:46 +0000
> From: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament at gmail.com>
> Subject: [cdi-dev] ManageableContext hierarchy
> To: "cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org" <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <CAOqetn-mmfuWWTtgKiiMbV=WP36gKLM2=Pivr7Vb2v=
> UyFm2Ng at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> All,
>
> One of the items from our last conversation was to remove the hierarchy
> changes for ManageableContext.
>
> I'd like to propose that we re-evaluate the hierarchy post EDR2, to avoid
> too many changes.  This is related to CDI-30.
>
> If agreed, I can create a follow up ticket.
>
> John
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160715/8967178a/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:59:20 +0000
> From: Travis CI <builds at travis-ci.org>
> Subject: [cdi-dev] Passed: cdi-spec/cdi#22 (2.0-EDR2 - 5b77f45)
> To: <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Message-ID:
>
> <578ca878916ce_33f98a949d7bc8168af at 17287723-a229-46ff-8c0f-465f15696c07.mail
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Build Update for cdi-spec/cdi
> -------------------------------------
>
> Build: #22
> Status: Passed
>
> Duration: 8 minutes and 30 seconds
> Commit: 5b77f45 (2.0-EDR2)
> Author: Antoine Sabot-Durand
> Message: Adding travis CI config
>
> View the changeset:
> https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/compare/19a471aa497f...5b77f45d99d5
>
> View the full build log and details:
> https://travis-ci.org/cdi-spec/cdi/builds/145494191
>
> --
>
> You can configure recipients for build notifications in your .travis.yml
> file. See https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/notifications
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160718/f2041438/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html).  For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
> End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 68, Issue 8
> **************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160718/e9bb7264/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list