[cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting
Werner Keil
werner.keil at gmail.com
Tue Jun 21 11:31:31 EDT 2016
As I don't have audio where I am during the day, only Friday (when I leave
earlier in most cases) would work for me.
Werner
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:16 PM, <cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org> wrote:
> Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cdi-dev-owner at lists.jboss.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: CDI-30 hangout meeting (Antoine Sabot-Durand)
> 2. Re: CDI-30 hangout meeting (John D. Ament)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:13:54 +0000
> From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting
> To: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament at gmail.com>, Martin Kouba
> <mkouba at redhat.com>, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>
> Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CABu-YBQL7c_BUkBuZztSvnL4yrih4k5Vtvbz_-jf1K=
> z1n2gjQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> So choices are Friday 24th 5:00 pm CET (same timeslot than our weekly
> meeting) or Monday 27th 5:00pm CET.
> I can do both but prefer Monday.
>
> What is your choice?
>
> Antoine
>
> Le mar. 21 juin 2016 ? 16:35, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a
> ?crit :
>
> > I just went through the PR one more time. It seems like these are the
> > areas of open discussion still:
> >
> > - The name of the class "ActiveContext" needs to be decided. I'm in
> > agreement its a bad name, but switching to past tense doesn't help IMHO.
> > - Disassociating the thread model and the context model. This is the
> > first change that supports this initiative, so I'm not sure if there are
> > any concerns with that change.
> > - The fact that contexts have IDs. To me it makes sense, but it seems
> > like this is not generally agreed (we need some unique identifier to make
> > sure we can bridge from existing)
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm on PTO until Jun 29 :-(
> >>
> >> However, we've already discussed this with Antoine so I think my
> >> presence is not required.
> >>
> >> Martin
> >>
> >> Dne 21.6.2016 v 16:23 John D. Ament napsal(a):
> >> > Unfortunately, my schedule's turned south this week and Friday as of
> now
> >> > is the only day I have open.
> >> >
> >> > What about next week? Monday?
> >> >
> >> > John
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:42 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com
> >> > <mailto:mkouba at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Any day except for Friday is ok for me.
> >> >
> >> > I have a feeling that it will be a tough discussion ;-)
> >> >
> >> > What I particularly dislike:
> >> > * ActiveContext.associate(Thread thread)
> >> > * the concept of the context id
> >> > * scopeType as a method param (I would prefer a specific
> >> method/class
> >> > for each supported scope)
> >> >
> >> > Anyway, if you look at Weld Context Management API [1] you'll find
> >> out
> >> > that it's pretty powerful but also quite complex. And I don't
> >> believe we
> >> > will be able to achieve the same level of funcionality with less
> >> complex
> >> > API (without sacrificing correctness).
> >> >
> >> > Martin
> >> >
> >> > [1]
> >> >
> >>
> http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html/contexts.html#_managing_the_built_in_contexts
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Dne 21.6.2016 v 09:22 Mark Struberg napsal(a):
> >> > > Somewhen this week in the evening (CEST).
> >> > > I?ll have a low availability for the following 2 weeks.
> >> > >
> >> > > LieGrue,
> >> > > strub
> >> > >
> >> > >> Am 20.06.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand
> >> > <antoine at sabot-durand.net <mailto:antoine at sabot-durand.net>>:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Hi all,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> We launched the idea to organize a meeting regarding John's
> >> > proposal regarding CDI-30:
> >> > >> https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/291
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I wasn't available last week (going to a conference) but I am
> >> > this week.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> So what are your favorite slots for this meeting ?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Antoine
> >> > >> _______________________________________________
> >> > >> cdi-dev mailing list
> >> > >> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> >> > licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >> > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
> >> > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> >> > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > cdi-dev mailing list
> >> > > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >> > >
> >> > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> >> > licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >> > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
> >> > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> >> > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Martin Kouba
> >> > Software Engineer
> >> > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > cdi-dev mailing list
> >> > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >> >
> >> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> licenses
> >> > the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >> > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
> >> > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> >> > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Martin Kouba
> >> Software Engineer
> >> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> >>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/c30cfd7d/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:16:23 -0400
> From: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting
> To: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
> Cc: cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAOqetn_3uk-WxjhT438TFueB3_fYnXQfmw+NHpFrZ2BZ3ZJBXw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Monday is better for me but I can do both.
> On Jun 21, 2016 11:14, "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
> wrote:
>
> > So choices are Friday 24th 5:00 pm CET (same timeslot than our weekly
> > meeting) or Monday 27th 5:00pm CET.
> > I can do both but prefer Monday.
> >
> > What is your choice?
> >
> > Antoine
> >
> > Le mar. 21 juin 2016 ? 16:35, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a
> > ?crit :
> >
> >> I just went through the PR one more time. It seems like these are the
> >> areas of open discussion still:
> >>
> >> - The name of the class "ActiveContext" needs to be decided. I'm in
> >> agreement its a bad name, but switching to past tense doesn't help IMHO.
> >> - Disassociating the thread model and the context model. This is the
> >> first change that supports this initiative, so I'm not sure if there are
> >> any concerns with that change.
> >> - The fact that contexts have IDs. To me it makes sense, but it seems
> >> like this is not generally agreed (we need some unique identifier to
> make
> >> sure we can bridge from existing)
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm on PTO until Jun 29 :-(
> >>>
> >>> However, we've already discussed this with Antoine so I think my
> >>> presence is not required.
> >>>
> >>> Martin
> >>>
> >>> Dne 21.6.2016 v 16:23 John D. Ament napsal(a):
> >>> > Unfortunately, my schedule's turned south this week and Friday as of
> >>> now
> >>> > is the only day I have open.
> >>> >
> >>> > What about next week? Monday?
> >>> >
> >>> > John
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:42 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com
> >>> > <mailto:mkouba at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Any day except for Friday is ok for me.
> >>> >
> >>> > I have a feeling that it will be a tough discussion ;-)
> >>> >
> >>> > What I particularly dislike:
> >>> > * ActiveContext.associate(Thread thread)
> >>> > * the concept of the context id
> >>> > * scopeType as a method param (I would prefer a specific
> >>> method/class
> >>> > for each supported scope)
> >>> >
> >>> > Anyway, if you look at Weld Context Management API [1] you'll
> find
> >>> out
> >>> > that it's pretty powerful but also quite complex. And I don't
> >>> believe we
> >>> > will be able to achieve the same level of funcionality with less
> >>> complex
> >>> > API (without sacrificing correctness).
> >>> >
> >>> > Martin
> >>> >
> >>> > [1]
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html/contexts.html#_managing_the_built_in_contexts
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Dne 21.6.2016 v 09:22 Mark Struberg napsal(a):
> >>> > > Somewhen this week in the evening (CEST).
> >>> > > I?ll have a low availability for the following 2 weeks.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > LieGrue,
> >>> > > strub
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> Am 20.06.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand
> >>> > <antoine at sabot-durand.net <mailto:antoine at sabot-durand.net>>:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Hi all,
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> We launched the idea to organize a meeting regarding John's
> >>> > proposal regarding CDI-30:
> >>> > >> https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/291
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> I wasn't available last week (going to a conference) but I am
> >>> > this week.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> So what are your favorite slots for this meeting ?
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Antoine
> >>> > >> _______________________________________________
> >>> > >> cdi-dev mailing list
> >>> > >> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >>> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> >>> > licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >>> > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
> >>> > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> >>> > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > _______________________________________________
> >>> > > cdi-dev mailing list
> >>> > > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> >>> > licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >>> > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
> >>> > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> >>> > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Martin Kouba
> >>> > Software Engineer
> >>> > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > cdi-dev mailing list
> >>> > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>> >
> >>> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> licenses
> >>> > the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> >>> > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
> >>> > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> >>> > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Martin Kouba
> >>> Software Engineer
> >>> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> >>>
> >>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/3e4c083b/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
> End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 67, Issue 12
> ***************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/c7ed4a30/attachment-0001.html
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list