[cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting

Emily Jiang EMIJIANG at uk.ibm.com
Tue Jun 21 12:22:13 EDT 2016


I can do Friday but not Monday. In the meanwhile, I'll go through the code 
changes to add any comments I have.

Many thanks,
Emily
===========================
Emily Jiang
WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
 
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
Phone:  +44 (0)1962 816278  Internal: 246278

Email: emijiang at uk.ibm.com 
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM at IBMGB




From:   Werner Keil <werner.keil at gmail.com>
To:     cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>, 
Date:   21/06/2016 16:33
Subject:        Re: [cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting
Sent by:        cdi-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org



As I don't have audio where I am during the day, only Friday (when I leave 
earlier in most cases) would work for me.

Werner



On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:16 PM, <cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org> wrote:
Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to
        cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        cdi-dev-owner at lists.jboss.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: CDI-30 hangout meeting (Antoine Sabot-Durand)
   2. Re: CDI-30 hangout meeting (John D. Ament)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:13:54 +0000
From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting
To: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament at gmail.com>, Martin Kouba
        <mkouba at redhat.com>,    Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>
Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
        <CABu-YBQL7c_BUkBuZztSvnL4yrih4k5Vtvbz_-jf1K=
z1n2gjQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

So choices are Friday 24th 5:00 pm CET (same timeslot than our weekly
meeting) or Monday 27th 5:00pm CET.
I can do both but prefer Monday.

What is your choice?

Antoine

Le mar. 21 juin 2016 ? 16:35, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a
?crit :

> I just went through the PR one more time.  It seems like these are the
> areas of open discussion still:
>
> - The name of the class "ActiveContext" needs to be decided.  I'm in
> agreement its a bad name, but switching to past tense doesn't help IMHO.
> - Disassociating the thread model and the context model.  This is the
> first change that supports this initiative, so I'm not sure if there are
> any concerns with that change.
> - The fact that contexts have IDs.  To me it makes sense, but it seems
> like this is not generally agreed (we need some unique identifier to 
make
> sure we can bridge from existing)
>
> John
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm on PTO until Jun 29 :-(
>>
>> However, we've already discussed this with Antoine so I think my
>> presence is not required.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> Dne 21.6.2016 v 16:23 John D. Ament napsal(a):
>> > Unfortunately, my schedule's turned south this week and Friday as of 
now
>> > is the only day I have open.
>> >
>> > What about next week? Monday?
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:42 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com
>> > <mailto:mkouba at redhat.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Any day except for Friday is ok for me.
>> >
>> >     I have a feeling that it will be a tough discussion ;-)
>> >
>> >     What I particularly dislike:
>> >     * ActiveContext.associate(Thread thread)
>> >     * the concept of the context id
>> >     * scopeType as a method param (I would prefer a specific
>> method/class
>> >     for each supported scope)
>> >
>> >     Anyway, if you look at Weld Context Management API [1] you'll 
find
>> out
>> >     that it's pretty powerful but also quite complex. And I don't
>> believe we
>> >     will be able to achieve the same level of funcionality with less
>> complex
>> >     API (without sacrificing correctness).
>> >
>> >     Martin
>> >
>> >     [1]
>> >
>> 
http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html/contexts.html#_managing_the_built_in_contexts

>> >
>> >
>> >     Dne 21.6.2016 v 09:22 Mark Struberg napsal(a):
>> >      > Somewhen this week in the evening (CEST).
>> >      > I?ll have a low availability for the following 2 weeks.
>> >      >
>> >      > LieGrue,
>> >      > strub
>> >      >
>> >      >> Am 20.06.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand
>> >     <antoine at sabot-durand.net <mailto:antoine at sabot-durand.net>>:
>> >      >>
>> >      >> Hi all,
>> >      >>
>> >      >> We launched the idea to organize a meeting regarding John's
>> >     proposal regarding CDI-30:
>> >      >> https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/291
>> >      >>
>> >      >> I wasn't available last week (going to a conference) but I am
>> >     this week.
>> >      >>
>> >      >> So what are your favorite slots for this meeting ?
>> >      >>
>> >      >> Antoine
>> >      >> _______________________________________________
>> >      >> cdi-dev mailing list
>> >      >> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> >      >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>> >      >>
>> >      >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
>> >     licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>> >     (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>> >      >
>> >      >
>> >      > _______________________________________________
>> >      > cdi-dev mailing list
>> >      > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> >      > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>> >      >
>> >      > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
>> >     licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>> >     (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>> >      >
>> >
>> >     --
>> >     Martin Kouba
>> >     Software Engineer
>> >     Red Hat, Czech Republic
>> >     _______________________________________________
>> >     cdi-dev mailing list
>> >     cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> >     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>> >
>> >     Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider 
licenses
>> >     the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>> >     (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Martin Kouba
>> Software Engineer
>> Red Hat, Czech Republic
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/c30cfd7d/attachment-0001.html


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:16:23 -0400
From: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting
To: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
Cc: cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
Message-ID:
        <
CAOqetn_3uk-WxjhT438TFueB3_fYnXQfmw+NHpFrZ2BZ3ZJBXw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Monday is better for me but I can do both.
On Jun 21, 2016 11:14, "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
wrote:

> So choices are Friday 24th 5:00 pm CET (same timeslot than our weekly
> meeting) or Monday 27th 5:00pm CET.
> I can do both but prefer Monday.
>
> What is your choice?
>
> Antoine
>
> Le mar. 21 juin 2016 ? 16:35, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a
> ?crit :
>
>> I just went through the PR one more time.  It seems like these are the
>> areas of open discussion still:
>>
>> - The name of the class "ActiveContext" needs to be decided.  I'm in
>> agreement its a bad name, but switching to past tense doesn't help 
IMHO.
>> - Disassociating the thread model and the context model.  This is the
>> first change that supports this initiative, so I'm not sure if there 
are
>> any concerns with that change.
>> - The fact that contexts have IDs.  To me it makes sense, but it seems
>> like this is not generally agreed (we need some unique identifier to 
make
>> sure we can bridge from existing)
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com> 
wrote:
>>
>>> I'm on PTO until Jun 29 :-(
>>>
>>> However, we've already discussed this with Antoine so I think my
>>> presence is not required.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> Dne 21.6.2016 v 16:23 John D. Ament napsal(a):
>>> > Unfortunately, my schedule's turned south this week and Friday as of
>>> now
>>> > is the only day I have open.
>>> >
>>> > What about next week? Monday?
>>> >
>>> > John
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:42 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com
>>> > <mailto:mkouba at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     Any day except for Friday is ok for me.
>>> >
>>> >     I have a feeling that it will be a tough discussion ;-)
>>> >
>>> >     What I particularly dislike:
>>> >     * ActiveContext.associate(Thread thread)
>>> >     * the concept of the context id
>>> >     * scopeType as a method param (I would prefer a specific
>>> method/class
>>> >     for each supported scope)
>>> >
>>> >     Anyway, if you look at Weld Context Management API [1] you'll 
find
>>> out
>>> >     that it's pretty powerful but also quite complex. And I don't
>>> believe we
>>> >     will be able to achieve the same level of funcionality with less
>>> complex
>>> >     API (without sacrificing correctness).
>>> >
>>> >     Martin
>>> >
>>> >     [1]
>>> >
>>> 
http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html/contexts.html#_managing_the_built_in_contexts

>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     Dne 21.6.2016 v 09:22 Mark Struberg napsal(a):
>>> >      > Somewhen this week in the evening (CEST).
>>> >      > I?ll have a low availability for the following 2 weeks.
>>> >      >
>>> >      > LieGrue,
>>> >      > strub
>>> >      >
>>> >      >> Am 20.06.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand
>>> >     <antoine at sabot-durand.net <mailto:antoine at sabot-durand.net>>:
>>> >      >>
>>> >      >> Hi all,
>>> >      >>
>>> >      >> We launched the idea to organize a meeting regarding John's
>>> >     proposal regarding CDI-30:
>>> >      >> https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/291
>>> >      >>
>>> >      >> I wasn't available last week (going to a conference) but I 
am
>>> >     this week.
>>> >      >>
>>> >      >> So what are your favorite slots for this meeting ?
>>> >      >>
>>> >      >> Antoine
>>> >      >> _______________________________________________
>>> >      >> cdi-dev mailing list
>>> >      >> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> >      >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>> >      >>
>>> >      >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
>>> >     licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>>> >     (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>>> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>>> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>> >      >
>>> >      >
>>> >      > _______________________________________________
>>> >      > cdi-dev mailing list
>>> >      > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> >      > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>> >      >
>>> >      > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
>>> >     licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>>> >     (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>>> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>>> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>> >      >
>>> >
>>> >     --
>>> >     Martin Kouba
>>> >     Software Engineer
>>> >     Red Hat, Czech Republic
>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>> >     cdi-dev mailing list
>>> >     cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> >     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>> >
>>> >     Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider 
licenses
>>> >     the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>>> >     (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>>> >     ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>>> >     other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Martin Kouba
>>> Software Engineer
>>> Red Hat, Czech Republic
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/3e4c083b/attachment.html


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the 
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html).  For all other ideas 
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other 
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.

End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 67, Issue 12
***************************************
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the 
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas 
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other 
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/268e7a90/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list