On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 13:02, Pete Muir <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pmuir@redhat.com">pmuir@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I was just chatting to Marius, and I would propose we also offer Instance<> for injection directly into extensions. It won't be usable during lifecycle events, but can be easily used during application execution. I'll write this up later.<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, that certainly would be useful. Not to mention it makes the intent of the extension much more readable...in a way it declares the beans it's going to be addressing.</div><div><br>
</div><div>-Dan</div><div> </div></div>-- <br><div>Dan Allen</div>Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><div><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br></div><br>