<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>Is CDI really the right place for this Annotation?<br><br>It sounds like this has behavior specific to JTA, which leads me to think that it should be added in the JTA spec, not the CDI spec. What needs to change in the core CDI behavior to make this possible, if anything? If this can be achieved with existing SPIs, then I don't see why CDI would need to change at all to support this.<br><br>~Lincoln<br><br><hr id="zwchr"><div style="color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Reza Rahman" <reza_rahman@lycos.com><br><b>To: </b>cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org<br><b>Sent: </b>Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:28:13 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>[cdi-dev] Transaction Scope for CDI<br><br><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal">CDI enthusiasts,</p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal">Pete, I and Nigel (JMS 2 spec lead) have been discussing the issue of the transaction scope behind the scenes the past few weeks. Attached is what we came up with and feel it meets the various related use-cases the most effectively. The downside is that it is quite involved (conceptually) and might take a bit of patience to absorb. Please give it a read and let me know your thoughts.</p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal">Cheers,</p><p class="MsoNormal">Reza</p></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>cdi-dev mailing list<br>cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org<br>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev<br></div><br></div></body></html>