<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Yes, the spirit of the current JIRAs is not to mention subclassing specifically, but to specify the effects that we expect (i.e. constructors, public fields, self-invocation, etc).<div><br><div><div>On 2012-09-17, at 11:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <<a href="mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com">rmannibucau@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><p>Hi,</p><p>There is a bunch of jira to specify subclassing should be used in some cases so i mail here instead of answering all jira.</p><p>IMO it is specifying too much the technical part: specify the constructor should be called twice is better for a spec IMHO (but this case is not logical at all ;))</p><p>Why this need?</p><p>- Romain</p>
_______________________________________________<br>cdi-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>