<div dir="ltr">+1 for @Priority<div><br></div><div>José</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-10-28 16:17 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:werner.keil@gmail.com" target="_blank">werner.keil@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Yep, if SE 8 should switch to a new MR of 250, then it would spare EE 8 the Trouble and redundancy (assuming none of the other annotations changed at all between 1.1 and 1.2, there would be no clash, otherwise you could get a Version you don't expect depending on which one's available on the relevant classpath<img style="margin:0px 0.2ex;vertical-align:middle" src="cid:347@goomoji.gmail" goomoji="347">) </div><div>If it doesn't, then both EE 8 and CDI "light" would need to use the latest MR which would then of course contain the necessary enhancement, so especially if we only care about @Priority, we're fine either way.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Werner</div><div><div class="h5"><div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Mark Struberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:struberg@yahoo.de" target="_blank">struberg@yahoo.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">+1<br>
<br>
We are lucky that SE did _not_ yet update, so let's act now ;)<br>
<br>
LieGrue,<br>
strub<br>
<div><div><br>
<br>
<br>
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014, 13:01, Werner Keil <<a href="mailto:werner.keil@gmail.com" target="_blank">werner.keil@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
><br>
><br>
>It seems, Java SE 8 despite released in 2014 used an OLDER version of JSR 250 (1.0 or 1.1 at most) than Java EE 7, where @Priority (from 1.2) is included.<br>
><br>
><br>
>For consistency EE 8 will certainly keep it, but as of now, one would have to ask SE 8 to include the new version. Since EE 8 will build on SE 8 that seems like a conflict or at least redundancy if you have 2 identical annotations in the same classpath;-)<br>
><br>
><br>
>So it isn't just an issue for CDI alone, somewhere before EE 8 goes final, SE 8 will have to update to 1.2 or whatever is available then, so EE 8 can simply build on top of it instead of including a newer version of the same API in a pre-Jigsaw setup where this isn't a good thing to have, especially not on a platform level;-)<br>
><br>
><br>
>Should the Spec Lead of 250 be able to update @Priority before SE 8 fixes the inconsistency, then it would solve the Problems of both CDI 2 (light) and the full EE 8 stack.<br>
><br>
><br>
>Werner<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
>On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:50 PM, <<a href="mailto:cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to<br>
>> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>><br>
>>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
>> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a><br>
>>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
>> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>><br>
>>You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
>> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>><br>
>>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
>>than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>Today's Topics:<br>
>><br>
>> 1. Re: [VOTE] Using @Priority to order events instead of adding<br>
>> a parameter in @Observes (John D. Ament)<br>
>> 2. Re: cdi-dev Digest, Vol 47, Issue 13 (Werner Keil)<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>><br>
>>Message: 1<br>
>>Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:48:53 -0400<br>
>>From: "John D. Ament" <<a href="mailto:john.d.ament@gmail.com" target="_blank">john.d.ament@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] [VOTE] Using @Priority to order events instead<br>
>> of adding a parameter in @Observes<br>
>>To: Antoine Sabot-Durand <<a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>><br>
>>Cc: cdi-dev <<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>><br>
>>Message-ID:<br>
>> <CAOqetn9rpHpZNUV8UfK5Bn=+0S_TgZv=<a href="mailto:QN2xLW79SA25p4pP9g@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank">QN2xLW79SA25p4pP9g@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
>><br>
>>-1 (vote for a param in @Observes)<br>
>><br>
>>The reason being, it sounds like there's a lot of unknowns/gaps with trying<br>
>>to do #1. Plus only part of 250 ships with the JVM, as the rest of it<br>
>>comes from the EE spec:<br>
>><a href="https://javaee-spec.java.net/nonav/javadocs/javax/annotation/Priority.html" target="_blank">https://javaee-spec.java.net/nonav/javadocs/javax/annotation/Priority.html</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <<br>
>><a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> To add events ordering feature we have two choices:<br>
>>><br>
>>> 1) Use @Priority from common annotation specification (JSR-250) (vote +1)<br>
>>> pros:<br>
>>> - more consistent with other ordering mechanism we already have in CDI<br>
>>> (Interceptors, decorators, Alternatives)<br>
>>> - more Java EE consistent<br>
>>><br>
>>> cons:<br>
>>> - time consumed in JSR 250 MR participation (@Priority must be update to<br>
>>> support parameter for target)<br>
>>> - as @Priority is not part of Java SE, CDI light on java SE will have to<br>
>>> add the jsr250 jar as dependency only to have this annotation (which will<br>
>>> make it a little less light)<br>
>>><br>
>>> 2) Add a parameter to @Observes annotation to give order to an observer<br>
>>> (vote -1)<br>
>>> pros:<br>
>>> - works out of the box (we can add this property without ask for other<br>
>>> specs modification)<br>
>>> - avoid two annotations to declare an ordered observer (simpler usage)<br>
>>><br>
>>> cons:<br>
>>> - less Java EE spirit<br>
>>> - could be seen as an inconsistency with the way we order Interceptors,<br>
>>> Decorators and Alternatives.<br>
>>><br>
>>> ????????????????????<br>
>>><br>
>>> Who can vote? Everybody registered to this ML can vote. All votes will be<br>
>>> binding<br>
>>> How to vote? Answer this mail and vote +1 (for @Priority) 0 or -1(for<br>
>>> parameter in @Observes)<br>
>>> Vote will be closed in 72 hours<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> cdi-dev mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the<br>
>>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (<br>
>>> <a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" target="_blank">http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</a>). For all other ideas<br>
>>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other<br>
>>> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
>>-------------- next part --------------<br>
>>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
>>URL: <a href="http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20141028/fe500398/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20141028/fe500398/attachment-0001.html</a><br>
>><br>
>>------------------------------<br>
>><br>
>>Message: 2<br>
>>Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:50:14 +0100<br>
>>From: Werner Keil <<a href="mailto:werner.keil@gmail.com" target="_blank">werner.keil@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] cdi-dev Digest, Vol 47, Issue 13<br>
>>To: cdi-dev <<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>><br>
>>Message-ID:<br>
>> <CAAGawe2F9sw28==u28pexbMehB2V3Y=<a href="mailto:pvY1qS2YEZHoGmO%2BsFw@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank">pvY1qS2YEZHoGmO+sFw@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
>><br>
>>Interestingly there is no @Priority in Java SE 8 see that JavaDoc:<br>
>><a href="http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/javax/annotation/package-summary.html" target="_blank">http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/javax/annotation/package-summary.html</a><br>
>><br>
>>Meaning we won't get that one via Java 8 anyway, and it shows, there could<br>
>>be flexibility to pick just the annotations you need for CDI 2 under the<br>
>>right circumstances, too[?]<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:43 PM, <<a href="mailto:cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
>>> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a><br>
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
>>> than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Today's Topics:<br>
>>><br>
>>> 1. Re: [VOTE] Using @Priority to order events instead of adding<br>
>>> a parameter in @Observes (Werner Keil)<br>
>>> 2. Re: [VOTE] Using @Priority to order events instead of adding<br>
>>> a parameter in @Observes (Pete Muir)<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> ------------------------------<br>
>>><br>
>>> Message: 2<br>
>>> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:43:31 +0000<br>
>>> From: Pete Muir <<a href="mailto:pmuir@redhat.com" target="_blank">pmuir@redhat.com</a>><br>
>>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] [VOTE] Using @Priority to order events instead<br>
>>> of adding a parameter in @Observes<br>
>>> To: Werner Keil <<a href="mailto:werner.keil@gmail.com" target="_blank">werner.keil@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>> Cc: cdi-dev <<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>><br>
>>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:A2F18F27-2750-4C0C-8CF0-BD1E50227087@redhat.com" target="_blank">A2F18F27-2750-4C0C-8CF0-BD1E50227087@redhat.com</a>><br>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
>>><br>
>>> No, it is part of the JDK - check out the packages available in your IDE,<br>
>>> or look at the Javadoc.<br>
>>> <a href="http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/javax/annotation/package-summary.html" target="_blank">http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/javax/annotation/package-summary.html</a><br>
>>> <<br>
>>> <a href="http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/javax/annotation/package-summary.html" target="_blank">http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/javax/annotation/package-summary.html</a><br>
>>> ><br>
>>><br>
>>> We can get an MR no problem, however it is critical IMO that this update<br>
>>> makes it in the JDK in a timely fashion to avoid people having to use the<br>
>>> endorsed dir to upgrade JSR-250 (Antoine mentioned you have to add it as a<br>
>>> dependency, but it?s worse - you have to add it to the endorsed dir).<br>
>>><br>
>>> > On 28 Oct 2014, at 11:40, Werner Keil <<a href="mailto:werner.keil@gmail.com" target="_blank">werner.keil@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > AFAIK that is not part of the JDK, thus it should make it easier to ask<br>
>>> them for a MR, last happened about a year ago:<br>
>>> <a href="https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=250" target="_blank">https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=250</a> <<a href="https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=250" target="_blank">https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=250</a><br>
>>> ><br>
>>> ><br>
>>> ><br>
>>> ><br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Pete Muir <<a href="mailto:pmuir@redhat.com" target="_blank">pmuir@redhat.com</a> <mailto:<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:pmuir@redhat.com" target="_blank">pmuir@redhat.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
>>> > I would be +1 if we can get a commitment to update the version of<br>
>>> JSR-250 shipped in the JDK updated as well, otherwise -1<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> >> On 28 Oct 2014, at 10:13, Werner Keil <<a href="mailto:werner.keil@gmail.com" target="_blank">werner.keil@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:werner.keil@gmail.com" target="_blank">werner.keil@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> +1 for 1)<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> Unlike @Inject the Maven JAR for JSR-250 is a bit bigger (~20kb) but<br>
>>> there are existing dependencies that are not part of the JDK, most notably<br>
>>> JSR-330.<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> Not sure, if subpackages like "security" or "sql" under 250 matter at<br>
>>> all, if not, we could explore if the ideas for "stripping" libraries<br>
>>> proposed by Oracle may also work for SE/EE. This was discussed by OpenJDK<br>
>>> architects including Mark Reinhold with the EC. So far no real progress on<br>
>>> that, but till this JSR goes final or EE 8 it could work to get<br>
>>> dependencies a bit lighter, too.<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> It is likely, some annotation JSRs not just 250 need overhaul, e.g. to<br>
>>> finally make use of JSR-308, so an MR for 250 could be cumbersome, but<br>
>>> seems much easier here than e.g. bringing JSR-305 back to life;-)<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> Werner<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:58 AM, <<a href="mailto:cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org</a>>> wrote:<br>
>>> >> Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to<br>
>>> >> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>><br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
>>> >> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a> <<br>
>>> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a>><br>
>>> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
>>> >> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org</a> <mailto:<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org</a>><br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
>>> >> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org</a> <mailto:<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org</a>><br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
>>> >> than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> Today's Topics:<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> 1. Re: microbenchmark for CDI performance (Mohan Radhakrishnan)<br>
>>> >> 2. [VOTE] Using @Priority to order events instead of adding a<br>
>>> >> parameter in @Observes (Antoine Sabot-Durand)<br>
>>> >> 3. No meeting tomorrow (Antoine Sabot-Durand)<br>
>>> >> 4. Updated Invitation: CDI weekly meeting @ Weekly from 18:00 to<br>
>>> >> 19:00 on Wednesday except Wed 1 Oct 18:00, Wed 15 Oct 18:00 or<br>
>>> >> Wed 29 Oct 18:00 (ASD Perso) (<a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a> <mailto:<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>>)<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> Message: 2<br>
>>> >> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:56:14 +0100<br>
>>> >> From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <<a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a> <mailto:<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>>><br>
>>> >> Subject: [cdi-dev] [VOTE] Using @Priority to order events instead of<br>
>>> >> adding a parameter in @Observes<br>
>>> >> To: cdi-dev <<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>>><br>
>>> >> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:ECAAD9B3-649C-4856-BB24-82AB9EF41763@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">ECAAD9B3-649C-4856-BB24-82AB9EF41763@sabot-durand.net</a><br>
>>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ECAAD9B3-649C-4856-BB24-82AB9EF41763@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">ECAAD9B3-649C-4856-BB24-82AB9EF41763@sabot-durand.net</a>>><br>
>>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> To add events ordering feature we have two choices:<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> 1) Use @Priority from common annotation specification (JSR-250) (vote<br>
>>> +1)<br>
>>> >> pros:<br>
>>> >> - more consistent with other ordering mechanism we already have in CDI<br>
>>> (Interceptors, decorators, Alternatives)<br>
>>> >> - more Java EE consistent<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> cons:<br>
>>> >> - time consumed in JSR 250 MR participation (@Priority must be update<br>
>>> to support parameter for target)<br>
>>> >> - as @Priority is not part of Java SE, CDI light on java SE will have<br>
>>> to add the jsr250 jar as dependency only to have this annotation (which<br>
>>> will make it a little less light)<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> 2) Add a parameter to @Observes annotation to give order to an observer<br>
>>> (vote -1)<br>
>>> >> pros:<br>
>>> >> - works out of the box (we can add this property without ask for other<br>
>>> specs modification)<br>
>>> >> - avoid two annotations to declare an ordered observer (simpler usage)<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> cons:<br>
>>> >> - less Java EE spirit<br>
>>> >> - could be seen as an inconsistency with the way we order Interceptors,<br>
>>> Decorators and Alternatives.<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> ????????????????????<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> Who can vote? Everybody registered to this ML can vote. All votes will<br>
>>> be binding<br>
>>> >> How to vote? Answer this mail and vote +1 (for @Priority) 0 or -1(for<br>
>>> parameter in @Observes)<br>
>>> >> Vote will be closed in 72 hours<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> >> cdi-dev mailing list<br>
>>> >> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>><br>
>>> >> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a> <<br>
>>> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a>><br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the<br>
>>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (<br>
>>> <a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" target="_blank">http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</a> <<br>
>>> <a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" target="_blank">http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</a>>). For all other ideas<br>
>>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other<br>
>>> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> ><br>
>>><br>
>>> -------------- next part --------------<br>
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
>>> URL:<br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20141028/7a4d9ef6/attachment.html" target="_blank">http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20141028/7a4d9ef6/attachment.html</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> ------------------------------<br>
>>><br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> cdi-dev mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the<br>
>>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (<br>
>>> <a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" target="_blank">http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</a>). For all other ideas<br>
>>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other<br>
>>> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
>>><br>
>>> End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 47, Issue 13<br>
>>> ***************************************<br>
>>><br>
>>-------------- next part --------------<br>
>>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
>>URL: <a href="http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20141028/ee9da88a/attachment.html" target="_blank">http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20141028/ee9da88a/attachment.html</a><br>
>>-------------- next part --------------<br>
>>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
>>Name: not available<br>
>>Type: image/gif<br>
>>Size: 186 bytes<br>
>>Desc: not available<br>
>>Url : <a href="http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20141028/ee9da88a/attachment.gif" target="_blank">http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20141028/ee9da88a/attachment.gif</a><br>
>><br>
>>------------------------------<br>
>><br>
>>_______________________________________________<br>
>>cdi-dev mailing list<br>
>><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a><br>
>><br>
>>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (<a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" target="_blank">http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</a>). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
>><br>
>>End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14<br>
>>***************************************<br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
>_______________________________________________<br>
>cdi-dev mailing list<br>
><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a><br>
><br>
>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (<a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" target="_blank">http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</a>). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
cdi-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a><br>
<br>
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (<a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" target="_blank">http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</a>). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div><a href="http://blog.paumard.org" target="_blank">Java le soir</a> <a href="http://blog.paumard.org/cours-tutoriaux/" target="_blank">Cours Java en ligne</a></div><div><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/JosePaumard" target="_blank">Twitter</a> <a href="http://www.parisjug.org" target="_blank">Paris JUG</a> <a href="http://www.devoxx.fr" target="_blank">Devoxx France</a></div><div>M : +33 6 76 82 91 47</div>
</div>