<div dir="ltr">Hi,<br><br>On Saturday, July 4, 2015, Antoine Sabot-Durand <<a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Candi implements CDI 1.0 and never provided solution for java SE. To my knowledge that don't have plan for CDI 1.2 or 2.0. </blockquote><div><br></div>I noticed that Resin (which uses CanDI as its CDI implementation) is still active. I would assume that eventually they'll want to move to EE 7 and not stay on EE 6 "forever". But I'll ask in the Resin mailing group.<div><br></div><div>Anyway, maybe the sentence would be a little more correct if it was something like:</div><div><br></div><div>"Since the beginning two of the three early implementations (JBoss Weld and Apache OpenWebBeans) proposed proprietary solutions to use CDI in Java SE."</div><div><br></div><div>Kind regards,</div><div>Arjan Tijms</div><div><br><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>Antoine<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le sam. 4 juil. 2015 à 14:02, arjan tijms <<a>arjan.tijms@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
I've got one comment:<br>
<br>
>Since the beginning both implementations (JBoss Weld and Apache OpenWebBeans) proposed proprietary solutions to use CDI in Java SE.<br>
<br>
Aren't there 3 implementations really? CanDI implements CDI too, doesn't it?<br>
<br>
Kind regards,<br>
Arjan Tijms<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand<br>
<<a>antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> Of course it's CDI 2.0 EDR1 ;). <bad faith>it was a test to see if someone<br>
> was actually reading </bad faith><br>
><br>
> Antoine<br>
><br>
> Le 3 juil. 2015 à 15:41, John D. Ament <<a>john.d.ament@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br>
><br>
> Very nice! (though the email subject is a little misleading)<br>
><br>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:12 AM Antoine Sabot-Durand<br>
> <<a>antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi guys,<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> You can communicate on it or give me your feedback on the post<br>
>><br>
>> <a href="http://cdi-spec.org/news/2015/07/03/CDI-2_0-EDR1-released/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://cdi-spec.org/news/2015/07/03/CDI-2_0-EDR1-released/</a><br>
>><br>
>> Antoine<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> cdi-dev mailing list<br>
>> <a>cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a><br>
>><br>
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the<br>
>> code under the Apache License, Version 2<br>
>> (<a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</a>). For all other ideas<br>
>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual<br>
>> property rights inherent in such information.<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cdi-dev mailing list<br>
> <a>cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a><br>
><br>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code<br>
> under the Apache License, Version 2<br>
> (<a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</a>). For all other ideas<br>
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual<br>
> property rights inherent in such information.<br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</div>