<div style="white-space:pre-wrap">Yes Arjan, I think it's the first reason. We really should work with them to understand what should be added to CDI 2.0 to have it as a first citizen DI in their spec.<br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le sam. 29 août 2015 à 23:15, arjan tijms <<a href="mailto:arjan.tijms@gmail.com">arjan.tijms@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Antonio Goncalves<br>
<<a href="mailto:antonio.goncalves@gmail.com" target="_blank">antonio.goncalves@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I remember talking with the JAX-RS guys (Java EE), years ago (back in EE6),<br>
> and their answer for not adopting CDI was "too heavy".<br>
<br>
I can't find an exact reference anymore, but I somewhat remember that<br>
one of the reasons was also simply that CDI as a general solution<br>
finished late in Java EE 6, while JAX-RS finished earlier and had all<br>
the work for their own DI solution already done.<br>
</blockquote></div>