<div dir="ltr">+1 for the feature itself which allows to keep some basic backward compatibility (but I would add a way to notify the user of a - single - warning if this feature is actually needed and used)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><br><span style="font-size:small">Romain Manni-Bucau</span><br><a href="https://twitter.com/rmannibucau" target="_blank">@rmannibucau</a> | <a href="http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com" target="_blank">Blog</a> | <a href="https://github.com/rmannibucau" target="_blank">Github</a> | <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau" target="_blank">LinkedIn</a> | <a href="http://www.tomitribe.com" target="_blank">Tomitriber</a></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-02-09 17:37 GMT+01:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">-1</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le mar. 9 févr. 2016 à 17:36, Antoine Sabot-Durand <<a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi all,</div><div><br></div><div>There have been a lot of discussion around CDI-527 in the last weeks:</div><div><a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-527" target="_blank">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-527</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Mark proposed a PR:</div><div><a href="https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/271" target="_blank">https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/271</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>But we don't agree on adding this feature to the spec.</div><div>This vote is to decide if we should add this feature at the spec level now, or not.</div><div>Should we vote this feature down, that won't mean it will be completely dropped: it could be implemented as non portable feature in both Spec or even be included as experimental feature in the spec (in annexes) as describe in the PR comments</div><div>Vote starts now, only vote from EG members are binding (but you can give your opinion if not part of the EG) and will last 72 hours.</div><div><br></div><div>You vote with the following values:</div><div>+1 : I'm favorable for adding this feature in the spec<br></div><div>-1 : I'm against adding this feature in the spec</div><div>0 : I don't care</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you for your attention and your vote.</div></div><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>Antoine Sabot-Durand</div></div></blockquote></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
cdi-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a><br>
<br>
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (<a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</a>). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br></blockquote></div><br></div>