<div dir="ltr">At this point, I'm fine with #290, though I'm not sure why its introducing travis builds. I hope that no new issues pop up after renaming the class with #296, I plan to push up javadocs and spec changes this evening.<div><br></div><div>John<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:01 AM Antoine Sabot-Durand <<a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="white-space:pre-wrap">Hi All,<br><br>The release is still in 2 weeks and we have still 2 PR to close. <br><br>I'm still waiting +1 or feedback on <a href="https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/290" target="_blank">https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/290</a> to merge it or amend it.<br><br>There is still discussion going on John's PR : <a href="https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/296" target="_blank">https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/296</a><br>I propose that we set up an hangout meeting on Monday or Tuesday to solve this. <br><br>Antoine<br></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
cdi-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a><br>
<br>
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (<a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</a>). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.</blockquote></div></div></div>