<div dir="ltr">All,<div><br></div><div>Thanks for those who voted.</div><div><br></div><div>2 votes for ManageableContext</div><div>1 vote for ManagedContext</div><div>1 vote for UserManagedContext</div><div><br></div><div>Therefore I'm declaring the winner ManageableContext.</div><div><br></div><div>John<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 6:23 PM Emily Jiang <<a href="mailto:EMIJIANG@uk.ibm.com">EMIJIANG@uk.ibm.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><font size="2" face="sans-serif">We are trying to find a better name than
UnManagedContext.</font>
<br>
<br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">ManagedContext is surely opposite to
the option UnManagedContext:o.</font>
<br>
<br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">ManagableContext fits well with AlternableContext.
In addition, ManagableContext should be managed by others, which is the
same as UserManagedContext and it is shorter.</font>
<br>
<br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Hence, +1 for ManagableContext.</font>
<br>
<br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Many thanks,<br>
Emily<br>
===========================<br>
Emily Jiang<br>
WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead</font>
<br><font size="2" face="sans-serif"> <br>
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN<br>
Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278<br>
<br>
Email: <a href="mailto:emijiang@uk.ibm.com" target="_blank">emijiang@uk.ibm.com</a> <br>
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size="1" color="#5f5f5f" face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">Antoine Sabot-Durand
<<a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>></font>
<br><font size="1" color="#5f5f5f" face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">Matej Novotny <<a href="mailto:manovotn@redhat.com" target="_blank">manovotn@redhat.com</a>>,
"John D. Ament" <<a href="mailto:john.d.ament@gmail.com" target="_blank">john.d.ament@gmail.com</a>>, </font>
<br><font size="1" color="#5f5f5f" face="sans-serif">Cc:
</font><font size="1" face="sans-serif"><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a></font>
<br><font size="1" color="#5f5f5f" face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">11/07/2016 15:12</font>
<br><font size="1" color="#5f5f5f" face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">Re: [cdi-dev]
[VOTE] Name the class that can start/stop contexts</font>
<br><font size="1" color="#5f5f5f" face="sans-serif">Sent by:
</font><font size="1" face="sans-serif"><a href="mailto:cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org</a></font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size="3">+1 for UserManagedContext, it says clearly that user is
in charge of managing the context.</font>
<br><font size="3">ManageableContext is ok as fallback to me but the fact
the the context is manageable does not says anything about who has the
responsibility to manage it.</font>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size="3">Le lun. 11 juil. 2016 à 11:02, Matej Novotny
<</font><a href="mailto:manovotn@redhat.com" target="_blank"><font size="3" color="blue"><u>manovotn@redhat.com</u></font></a><font size="3">>
a écrit :</font>
<br><font size="3">+1 for ManageableContext<br>
<br>
Personally I would still have UnmanagedContext, but since that seems ambiguous
(as does ManagedContext),<br>
I chose ManageableContext.<br>
<br>
Matej<br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
> From: "John D. Ament" <</font><a href="mailto:john.d.ament@gmail.com" target="_blank"><font size="3" color="blue"><u>john.d.ament@gmail.com</u></font></a><font size="3">><br>
> To: </font><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank"><font size="3" color="blue"><u>cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</u></font></a><font size="3"><br>
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 2:50:23 AM<br>
> Subject: [cdi-dev] [VOTE] Name the class that can start/stop contexts<br>
><br>
> All,<br>
><br>
> It seems like one of the remaining issues with CDI-30 is the name
for the<br>
> class for the context management. This name isn't permanent, we can
change<br>
> after EDR2, but not after final.<br>
><br>
> Here's the proposed renames for "UnmanagedContext":<br>
><br>
> - ManagedContext<br>
> - ManageableContext<br>
> - ProgrammaticContext<br>
> - ExternallyManagedContext<br>
> - UserManagedContext<br>
><br>
> Please respond back with your vote, I'll leave this open for 3 days
( I<br>
> believe its Monday morning in central Europe), so I'll close it Thursday<br>
> morning.<br>
><br>
> Reference:<br>
> </font><a href="http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/cdi-dev/2016/cdi-dev.2016-07-07-16.03.log.html" target="_blank"><font size="3" color="blue"><u>http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/cdi-dev/2016/cdi-dev.2016-07-07-16.03.log.html</u></font></a><font size="3"><br>
><br>
> - John<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cdi-dev mailing list<br>
> </font><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank"><font size="3" color="blue"><u>cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</u></font></a><font size="3"><br>
> </font><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank"><font size="3" color="blue"><u>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</u></font></a><font size="3"><br>
><br>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
the code<br>
> under the Apache License, Version 2<br>
> (</font><a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" target="_blank"><font size="3" color="blue"><u>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</u></font></a><font size="3">).
For all other ideas<br>
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual<br>
> property rights inherent in such information.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cdi-dev mailing list</font><font size="3" color="blue"><u><br>
</u></font><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank"><font size="3" color="blue"><u>cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</u></font></a><font size="3" color="blue"><u><br>
</u></font><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank"><font size="3" color="blue"><u>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</u></font></a><font size="3"><br>
<br>
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (</font><a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" target="_blank"><font size="3" color="blue"><u>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</u></font></a><font size="3">).
For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent
and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.</font><tt><font size="2">_______________________________________________<br>
cdi-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
</font></tt><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" target="_blank"><tt><font size="2">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</font></tt></a><tt><font size="2"><br>
<br>
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (</font></tt><a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" target="_blank"><tt><font size="2">http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</font></tt></a><tt><font size="2">).
For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent
and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.</font></tt>
<br><font size="2" face="sans-serif"><br>
Unless stated otherwise above:<br>
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. <br>
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU<br>
</font></blockquote></div></div></div>