<div dir="ltr">Hello Antoine,<div><br></div><div>concurrency-utilities use <span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"courier new",courier,mono;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold">ContextFactory</span> for something pretty close (a proxying adding spec features over invocations) which is less "cglib-like" than "Enhancer" so I'd like to keep Factory. In the list <span style="font-size:12.8px">InterceptionFactory looks clear enough. We neevr speak of business method anymore I think so it would add a difficulty for something very useful to go that deep in the naming I think.</span></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><br><span style="font-size:small">Romain Manni-Bucau</span><br><a href="https://twitter.com/rmannibucau" target="_blank">@rmannibucau</a> | <a href="https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com" target="_blank">Blog</a> | <a href="http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com" target="_blank">Old Blog</a> | <a href="https://github.com/rmannibucau" target="_blank">Github</a> | <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau" target="_blank">LinkedIn</a> | <a href="https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com" target="_blank">JavaEE Factory</a></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-11-07 15:44 GMT+01:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net" target="_blank">antoine@sabot-durand.net</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi all,<div><br></div><div>In my last review for CDI-580 (<a href="https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/315" target="_blank">https://github.com/cdi-spec/<wbr>cdi/pull/315</a>), I removed all reference to proxies in Javadoc and spec doc following various feedback.</div><div>So now the name of the interface is the only one dealing with Proxy, so we really need to find it a new name.</div><div>I listed some proposal in PR 315:</div><div><div>- InstanceEnhancer (short but not very clear)</div><div>- BusinessMethodInvocationFactor<wbr>y (more exact from spec pov, but is it clear from user pov?)</div><div>- InterceptionFactory (cleared from user pov and near our initial name)</div><div>- InterceptionEnhancer</div></div><div><br></div><div>Feedback and other names are welcome.</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Antoine</div></font></span></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
cdi-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org">cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</a><br>
<br>
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (<a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.apache.org/<wbr>licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</a>). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br></blockquote></div><br></div>