<font size=2 face="sans-serif">InterceptionWrapperFactory sounds better
than the InterceptionFactory.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Many thanks,<br>
Emily<br>
===========================<br>
Emily Jiang<br>
WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> <br>
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN<br>
Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278<br>
<br>
Email: emijiang@uk.ibm.com <br>
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Martin Kouba <mkouba@redhat.com></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Cc:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cdi-dev <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">15/11/2016 10:22</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: [cdi-dev]
Finding a new name for InterceptorProxyFactory</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Sent by:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org</font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>Maybe we could switch back to "wrapper",
i.e. something like <br>
InterceptionWrapperFactory so that it's clear that the final object is
<br>
actually just a wrapper of the original instance that handles interception.<br>
<br>
Martin<br>
<br>
Dne 14.11.2016 v 12:10 Emily Jiang napsal(a):<br>
> Small correction: *InterceptionConfigurator *is what I suggested (not<br>
> InterceptorConfigurator).<br>
><br>
> Many thanks,<br>
> Emily<br>
> ===========================<br>
> Emily Jiang<br>
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead<br>
><br>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN<br>
> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278<br>
><br>
> Email: emijiang@uk.ibm.com<br>
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> From: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB<br>
> To: John Ament <john.ament@spartasystems.com><br>
> Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org><br>
> Date: 14/11/2016 10:43<br>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Finding a new name
for<br>
> InterceptorProxyFactory<br>
> Sent by: cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org<br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> I looked at the methods under *InterceptionFactory*. To me, it sounds<br>
> better to rename it to *InterceptorConfigurator *as it has .configure()<br>
> plus it configures or wraps the classes.<br>
><br>
> Thoughts?<br>
><br>
> Many thanks,<br>
> Emily<br>
> ===========================<br>
> Emily Jiang<br>
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead<br>
><br>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN<br>
> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278<br>
><br>
> Email: emijiang@uk.ibm.com<br>
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> From: John Ament <john.ament@spartasystems.com><br>
> To: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine@sabot-durand.net>,
cdi-dev<br>
> <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org><br>
> Date: 08/11/2016 17:17<br>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Finding a new name
for InterceptorProxyFactory<br>
> Sent by: cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org<br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> I can't think of any, just want to make sure no one else was.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> *<br>
> From:* Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine@sabot-durand.net>*<br>
> Sent:* Tuesday, November 8, 2016 12:04 PM*<br>
> To:* John Ament; cdi-dev*<br>
> Subject:* Re: [cdi-dev] Finding a new name for InterceptorProxyFactory<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:38 PM John Ament<br>
> <_john.ament@spartasystems.com_ <</font></tt><a href=mailto:john.ament@spartasystems.com><tt><font size=2>mailto:john.ament@spartasystems.com</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> wrote:<br>
> If the only use case is for inceptors, I agree to InterceptionFactory.<br>
><br>
> What other use case you are thinking of John?<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> *<br>
> From:* _cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><_cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>
on behalf of Werner Keil<br>
> <_werner.keil@gmail.com_ <</font></tt><a href=mailto:werner.keil@gmail.com><tt><font size=2>mailto:werner.keil@gmail.com</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>*<br>
> Sent:* Tuesday, November 8, 2016 8:30 AM*<br>
> To:* cdi-dev*<br>
><br>
> Subject:* Re: [cdi-dev] Finding a new name for InterceptorProxyFactory<br>
> +1 for InterceptionFactory, too.<br>
> It sounds simpler.<br>
><br>
> Werner<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:29 PM, <_cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>
wrote:<br>
> Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to<br>
> _cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
><br>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
> _https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev_<br>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
> _cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
><br>
> You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
> _cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
><br>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
> than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."<br>
><br>
><br>
> Today's Topics:<br>
><br>
> 1. Re: Finding a new name for InterceptorProxyFactory (Mark
Struberg)<br>
> 2. Re: Finding a new name for InterceptorProxyFactory<br>
> (Antoine Sabot-Durand)<br>
> 3. Re: Finding a new name for InterceptorProxyFactory<br>
> (Romain Manni-Bucau)<br>
><br>
><br>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Message: 1<br>
> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:58:04 +0000 (UTC)<br>
> From: Mark Struberg <_struberg@yahoo.de_ <</font></tt><a href=mailto:struberg@yahoo.de><tt><font size=2>mailto:struberg@yahoo.de</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Finding a new name for InterceptorProxyFactory<br>
> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <_rmannibucau@gmail.com_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href=mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com><tt><font size=2>mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>,
Antoine Sabot-Durand<br>
> <_antoine@sabot-durand.net_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net"><tt><font size=2>mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> Cc: cdi-dev <_cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> Message-ID: <_421014798.1728352.1478537884045@mail.yahoo.com_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href=mailto:421014798.1728352.1478537884045@mail.yahoo.com><tt><font size=2>mailto:421014798.1728352.1478537884045@mail.yahoo.com</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8<br>
><br>
> InterceptionFactory sounds fine for me.<br>
><br>
><br>
> LieGrue,<br>
> strub<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Monday, 7 November 2016, 15:55, Romain Manni-Bucau<br>
> <_rmannibucau@gmail.com_ <</font></tt><a href=mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com><tt><font size=2>mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>
wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>Hello Antoine,<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>concurrency-utilities use ContextFactory for something pretty close
(a<br>
> proxying adding spec features over invocations) which is less<br>
> "cglib-like" than "Enhancer" so I'd like to keep
Factory. In the list<br>
> InterceptionFactory looks clear enough. We neevr speak of business<br>
> method anymore I think so it would add a difficulty for something
very<br>
> useful to go that deep in the naming I think.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>Romain Manni-Bucau<br>
>>@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | JavaEE
Factory<br>
>><br>
>>2016-11-07 15:44 GMT+01:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand<br>
> <_antoine@sabot-durand.net_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net"><tt><font size=2>mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>:<br>
>><br>
>>Hi all,<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>>In my last review for CDI-580<br>
> (_https://github.com/cdi-spec/_cdi/pull/315), I removed all reference
to<br>
> proxies in Javadoc and spec doc following various feedback.<br>
>>>So now the name of the interface is the only one dealing with
Proxy,<br>
> so we really need to find it a new name.<br>
>>>I listed some proposal in PR 315:<br>
>>>- InstanceEnhancer (short but not very clear)<br>
>>>- BusinessMethodInvocationFactor y (more exact from spec pov,
but is<br>
> it clear from user pov?)<br>
>>>- InterceptionFactory (cleared from user pov and near our initial
name)<br>
>>>- InterceptionEnhancer<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>>Feedback and other names are welcome.<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>>Antoine<br>
>>>______________________________ _________________<br>
>>>cdi-dev mailing list<br>
>>>_cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
>>>_https://lists.jboss.org/_mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev<br>
>>><br>
>>>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
licenses<br>
> the code under the Apache License, Version 2<br>
> (_http://www.apache.org/_licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas<br>
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other<br>
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>_______________________________________________<br>
>>cdi-dev mailing list<br>
>>_cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
>>_https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev_<br>
>><br>
>>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
the<br>
> code under the Apache License, Version 2<br>
> (_http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html_). For all other
ideas<br>
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other<br>
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Message: 2<br>
> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 13:24:28 +0000<br>
> From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <_antoine@sabot-durand.net_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net"><tt><font size=2>mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Finding a new name for InterceptorProxyFactory<br>
> To: Mark Struberg <_struberg@yahoo.de_ <</font></tt><a href=mailto:struberg@yahoo.de><tt><font size=2>mailto:struberg@yahoo.de</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>,<br>
> Romain Manni-Bucau<br>
> <_rmannibucau@gmail.com_ <</font></tt><a href=mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com><tt><font size=2>mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> Cc: cdi-dev <_cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> Message-ID:<br>
><br>
> <CABu-YBRhd8UYWck4-fibda_Ykoh-n=_u_Xfhs48tUcBCOw_TiAw@mail.gmail.com_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href=mailto:u_Xfhs48tUcBCOw_TiAw@mail.gmail.com><tt><font size=2>mailto:u_Xfhs48tUcBCOw_TiAw@mail.gmail.com</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
><br>
> +1 for InterceptionFactory as well. I change my PR with this name.<br>
><br>
> Romain, for the record, mentioning "business method invocation"
and<br>
> paragraph 7.2 is the only mean to bind this feature to the spec without<br>
> mentioning implementation specific stuff like proxies. That's why
the<br>
> javadoc and text for this new section lack clarity. In other word
we lack a<br>
> simple name for instances on which "methods invocation"
are "business<br>
> methods invocation".<br>
><br>
> Antoine<br>
><br>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:58 PM Mark Struberg <_struberg@yahoo.de_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href=mailto:struberg@yahoo.de><tt><font size=2>mailto:struberg@yahoo.de</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
>> InterceptionFactory sounds fine for me.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> LieGrue,<br>
>> strub<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Monday, 7 November 2016, 15:55, Romain Manni-Bucau <<br>
>> _rmannibucau@gmail.com_ <</font></tt><a href=mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com><tt><font size=2>mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>
wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
>> >Hello Antoine,<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> >concurrency-utilities use ContextFactory for something pretty
close (a<br>
>> proxying adding spec features over invocations) which is less
"cglib-like"<br>
>> than "Enhancer" so I'd like to keep Factory. In the
list<br>
>> InterceptionFactory looks clear enough. We neevr speak of business
method<br>
>> anymore I think so it would add a difficulty for something very
useful to<br>
>> go that deep in the naming I think.<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> >Romain Manni-Bucau<br>
>> >@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn |
JavaEE Factory<br>
>> ><br>
>> >2016-11-07 15:44 GMT+01:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand<br>
> <_antoine@sabot-durand.net_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net"><tt><font size=2>mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
>> >:<br>
>> ><br>
>> >Hi all,<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >>In my last review for CDI-580 (_https://github.com/cdi-spec/_<br>
>> cdi/pull/315), I removed all reference to proxies in Javadoc and
spec doc<br>
>> following various feedback.<br>
>> >>So now the name of the interface is the only one dealing
with Proxy, so<br>
>> we really need to find it a new name.<br>
>> >>I listed some proposal in PR 315:<br>
>> >>- InstanceEnhancer (short but not very clear)<br>
>> >>- BusinessMethodInvocationFactor y (more exact from spec
pov, but is it<br>
>> clear from user pov?)<br>
>> >>- InterceptionFactory (cleared from user pov and near
our initial name)<br>
>> >>- InterceptionEnhancer<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >>Feedback and other names are welcome.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >>Antoine<br>
>> >>______________________________ _________________<br>
>> >>cdi-dev mailing list<br>
>> >>_cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
>> >>_https://lists.jboss.org/_mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev<br>
>> >><br>
>> >>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
licenses the<br>
>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (_http://www.apache.org/_<br>
>> licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this
list, the<br>
>> provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights
inherent<br>
>> in such information.<br>
>> >><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> >_______________________________________________<br>
>> >cdi-dev mailing list<br>
>> >_cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
>> >_https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev_<br>
>> ><br>
>> >Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
licenses the<br>
>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (<br>
>> _http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html_). For all other
ideas<br>
>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other<br>
>> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
> -------------- next part --------------<br>
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
> URL:<br>
> _http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20161108/efa4663c/attachment-0001.html_<br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Message: 3<br>
> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:28:27 +0100<br>
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <_rmannibucau@gmail.com_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href=mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com><tt><font size=2>mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Finding a new name for InterceptorProxyFactory<br>
> To: Antoine Sabot-Durand <_antoine@sabot-durand.net_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net"><tt><font size=2>mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> Cc: cdi-dev <_cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> Message-ID:<br>
><br>
> <CACLE=_7N-q9Uk9F2JuAU9f4T5wb8u26MMJ_LbNNhd1LkeQxvcWg@mail.gmail.com_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href="mailto:7N-q9Uk9F2JuAU9f4T5wb8u26MMJ_LbNNhd1LkeQxvcWg@mail.gmail.com"><tt><font size=2>mailto:7N-q9Uk9F2JuAU9f4T5wb8u26MMJ_LbNNhd1LkeQxvcWg@mail.gmail.com</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
><br>
> 2016-11-08 14:24 GMT+01:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand<br>
> <_antoine@sabot-durand.net_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net"><tt><font size=2>mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>:<br>
><br>
>> +1 for InterceptionFactory as well. I change my PR with this name.<br>
>><br>
>> Romain, for the record, mentioning "business method invocation"
and<br>
>> paragraph 7.2 is the only mean to bind this feature to the spec
without<br>
>> mentioning implementation specific stuff like proxies. That's
why the<br>
>> javadoc and text for this new section lack clarity. In other word
we<br>
> lack a<br>
>> simple name for instances on which "methods invocation"
are "business<br>
>> methods invocation".<br>
>><br>
>><br>
> Agree and it fits the spec but since EJB I never heard any developer
(not<br>
> developping weld or openwebbeans) using this term so for the API it
would<br>
> be rude IMHO - was the point, nothing more.<br>
><br>
><br>
>> Antoine<br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:58 PM Mark Struberg <_struberg@yahoo.de_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href=mailto:struberg@yahoo.de><tt><font size=2>mailto:struberg@yahoo.de</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>
wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> InterceptionFactory sounds fine for me.<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> LieGrue,<br>
>>> strub<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> On Monday, 7 November 2016, 15:55, Romain Manni-Bucau <<br>
>>> _rmannibucau@gmail.com_ <</font></tt><a href=mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com><tt><font size=2>mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>
wrote:<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> >Hello Antoine,<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> ><br>
>>> >concurrency-utilities use ContextFactory for something
pretty close (a<br>
>>> proxying adding spec features over invocations) which is less<br>
> "cglib-like"<br>
>>> than "Enhancer" so I'd like to keep Factory. In
the list<br>
>>> InterceptionFactory looks clear enough. We neevr speak of
business method<br>
>>> anymore I think so it would add a difficulty for something
very useful to<br>
>>> go that deep in the naming I think.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> ><br>
>>> ><br>
>>> >Romain Manni-Bucau<br>
>>> >@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
| JavaEE Factory<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> >2016-11-07 15:44 GMT+01:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <<br>
>>> _antoine@sabot-durand.net_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net"><tt><font size=2>mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>>:<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> >Hi all,<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >>In my last review for CDI-580 (_https://github.com/cdi-spec/_<br>
>>> cdi/pull/315), I removed all reference to proxies in Javadoc
and spec doc<br>
>>> following various feedback.<br>
>>> >>So now the name of the interface is the only one dealing
with Proxy, so<br>
>>> we really need to find it a new name.<br>
>>> >>I listed some proposal in PR 315:<br>
>>> >>- InstanceEnhancer (short but not very clear)<br>
>>> >>- BusinessMethodInvocationFactor y (more exact from
spec pov, but is it<br>
>>> clear from user pov?)<br>
>>> >>- InterceptionFactory (cleared from user pov and near
our initial name)<br>
>>> >>- InterceptionEnhancer<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >>Feedback and other names are welcome.<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >>Antoine<br>
>>> >>______________________________ _________________<br>
>>> >>cdi-dev mailing list<br>
>>> >>_cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
>>> >>_https://lists.jboss.org/_mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >>Note that for all code provided on this list, the
provider licenses the<br>
>>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (_http://www.apache.org/_<br>
>>> licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on
this<br>
> list, the<br>
>>> provider waives all patent and other intellectual property
rights<br>
> inherent<br>
>>> in such information.<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> ><br>
>>> ><br>
>>> >_______________________________________________<br>
>>> >cdi-dev mailing list<br>
>>> >_cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
>>> >_https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev_<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> >Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
licenses the<br>
>>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (_http://www.apache.org/_<br>
>>> licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on
this list,<br>
>>> the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property
rights<br>
>>> inherent in such information.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> ><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
> -------------- next part --------------<br>
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
> URL:<br>
> _http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20161108/c6e8a845/attachment.html_<br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cdi-dev mailing list_<br>
> __cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>_<br>
> __https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev_<br>
><br>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
the<br>
> code under the Apache License, Version 2<br>
> (_http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html_). For all
other<br>
> ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other<br>
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
><br>
> End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 72, Issue 5<br>
> **************************************<br>
><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain<br>
> confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information which should
be<br>
> treated accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please<br>
> notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this message,
and<br>
> destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you.<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cdi-dev mailing list_<br>
> __cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_ <</font></tt><a href="mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org"><tt><font size=2>mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>_<br>
> __https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev_<br>
><br>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
the<br>
> code under the Apache License, Version 2<br>
> (_http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html_). For all other
ideas<br>
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other<br>
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain<br>
> confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information which should
be<br>
> treated accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please<br>
> notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this message,
and<br>
> destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you.<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cdi-dev mailing list<br>
> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org_<br>
> __https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev_<br>
><br>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
the<br>
> code under the Apache License, Version 2<br>
> (_http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html_). For all other
ideas<br>
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other<br>
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
><br>
> Unless stated otherwise above:<br>
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number<br>
> 741598.<br>
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6<br>
> 3AU_______________________________________________<br>
> cdi-dev mailing list<br>
> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org<br>
> </font></tt><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev"><tt><font size=2>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
><br>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
the<br>
> code under the Apache License, Version 2<br>
> (</font></tt><a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html"><tt><font size=2>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>).
For all other ideas<br>
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other<br>
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
><br>
> Unless stated otherwise above:<br>
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number<br>
> 741598.<br>
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cdi-dev mailing list<br>
> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org<br>
> </font></tt><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev"><tt><font size=2>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
><br>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (</font></tt><a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html"><tt><font size=2>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>).
For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent
and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
><br>
<br>
-- <br>
Martin Kouba<br>
Software Engineer<br>
Red Hat, Czech Republic<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cdi-dev mailing list<br>
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org<br>
</font></tt><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev"><tt><font size=2>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
<br>
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (</font></tt><a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html"><tt><font size=2>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>).
For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent
and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.<br>
<br>
</font></tt>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Unless stated otherwise above:<br>
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. <br>
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU<br>
</font>