[embjopr-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (EMBJOPR-33) Referencing JPA Persistence Units as PAR is an outdated specification term

Charles Crouch (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Fri Feb 13 12:01:57 EST 2009


     [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EMBJOPR-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Charles Crouch updated EMBJOPR-33:
----------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 1.2
                       (was: 1.1)


> Referencing JPA Persistence Units as PAR is an outdated specification term
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: EMBJOPR-33
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EMBJOPR-33
>             Project: Embedded Jopr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Look 'n' Feel (html/css)
>            Reporter: Shelly McGowan
>            Assignee: Charles Crouch
>             Fix For: 1.2
>
>
> One of the application types to be managed are JPA Persistence Units (PAR).     The archive suffix, .par, was used to reference a persistence archive.  This notion was removed in the Propsed Final Draft of the Persistence API 1.0 specification instead specifying the persistence unit should be packaged inside one or more .jar files.    Is it intentional for the management console to refer to the persistence unit application type as PARs to differentiate between other application types?      

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        



More information about the embjopr-issues mailing list