[errai-dev] Errai UI i18n Approach & Questions

[Eric Wittmann]

Is the bean lookup going to be done synchronously though (regardless of 
the impl)?  That's very important in this case.  The TemplateUtil is 
going to be invoked several times in sequence (different methods).  If 
one of the TemplateUtil methods does something asynchronously that's a 
problem.  If not, is there a wait-notify pattern that should be used?

-Eric

On 03/27/2013 01:24 PM, Christian Sadilek wrote:
> Actually we have just abstracted that. When you ask for the async bean manager IOC.getAsyncBeanManager() it will work in either case. If synchronous bean management is enabled it will return an adapter where the callback will just immediately be invoked.
>
> So, just always use the async bean manager API.  That code can of course also be generated, if you wanted/needed to.
>
> On 2013-03-27, at 1:19 PM, Eric Wittmann <eric.wittmann at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I think the advent of the async bean manager may have complicated this
>> though, right?  I don't *think* I can simply get the bean manager and
>> ask it for the bean (there are a couple of different getters now - one
>> to get the sync bean manager and one to get the async bean manager).
>>
>> One thing I tried that worked but that I don't like:  turn the
>> @ApplicationScoped bean into a singleton and reference it using a static
>> method.  Ugly but worked.  Ideally I think TemplateUtil should itself be
>> an injected bean, rather than a class with some static methods.
>>
>> But that just moves the problem to "how do I reference an injected bean
>> in code generated by a Decorator/Extension?"  :)
>>
>> On 03/27/2013 01:13 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>>> To answer Question #3, this would either need to be coded into the call
>>> to TemplateUtil from the BootstrapperImpl code (done in
>>> DecoratorTemplated.java) or I believe there is a convenience utility to
>>> get the BeanManager in Errai:
>>>
>>> CDI.current() or something like that. Mike?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Eric Wittmann
>>> <eric.wittmann at redhat.com <mailto:eric.wittmann at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hey guys.  I've sketched out a proposed approach (not 100% compete but
>>>     ok to start) for i18n.  Would appreciate it if you could take a look
>>>     at it.
>>>
>>>     At the bottom you will find 3 questions that I would (in particular)
>>>     love your thoughts on.
>>>
>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BapD4FHMNur0OYdIg-vwXYHWW_2Mhra_Ki2nYAh9qxY/pub
>>>
>>>     -Eric
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     errai-dev mailing list
>>>     errai-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:errai-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>>> http://ocpsoft.org
>>> "Simpler is better."
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> errai-dev mailing list
>>> errai-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> errai-dev mailing list
>> errai-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> errai-dev mailing list
> errai-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev
>