[esb-dev] build error

[Daniel Bevenius]

Tom, do you have a wireless network interface? 
I believe that you will still se this error if you run the 'integration' target.
 
I'll try to sort this out...I'll double check the jgroups configuration to see that it's using lookback.

Are you running windows? If so do you have the "Media Sence" thing turned on? Don't worry if you don't have time with this as I'll try to check this myself in the next few days. 

Thanks,

Daniel 



I did an update Daniel, and all seems to be fine again.

Thanks.

T.


Daniel Bevenius wrote:
> Sorry for not responding earlier...was out for lunch.
>
> I replied to Kurt yesterday but not to the mailing list.
>
> The problem was running without a network interface configured, and possibly with windows with wireless card (might have something to do with the Media access feature, but not sure yet)with the following clases:
>
> #svn diff --summarize  -r 12869:head
> D      ReadOnlyRemoteGatewayListenerUnitTest.java
> A      ReadOnlyRemoteGatewayListenerIntegrationTest.java
> D      remotestrategies/ReadOnlyRemoteFileSystemStrategyUnitTest.java
> D      remotestrategies/cache/DeleteOnEvictTreeCacheListenerUnitTest.java
> D      remotestrategies/cache/FtpFileCacheUnitTest.java
> A      remotestrategies/cache/FtpFileCacheIntegrationTest.java
> A      remotestrategies/cache/DeleteOnEvictTreeCacheListenerIntegrationTest.java
> A      remotestrategies/ReadOnlyRemoteFileSystemStrategyIntegrationTest.java
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r12870 | beve | 2007-06-26 19:38:50 +0200 (Tue, 26 Jun 2007) | 3 lines
>
> Renamed the Unit test to Integration test as they will not work unless one has a configured network interface.
> There seems to be a problem with running these on windows using a wireless card. Kurt reported the error.
>
> So, the classes have been renamed and should only being run during integration test if I'm not misstaken. 
>
> Are you all having these problems?
>
> Thanks
>
> /Daniel
>
>
> Adding Daniel to this in case he can shed any light (since I think he  
> added the ReadOnlyRemoteGateway stuff in the first place).
>
> Daniel, if you're not on the esb-dev list, add yourself as well.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark.
>
>
> On 27 Jun 2007, at 11:43, Tom Fennelly wrote:
>
>   
>> Actually, that's not what this thread is about.  There's an issue  
>> (jgroups) that both Kurt an I see wrt the  
>> "ReadOnlyRemoteGatewayListenerUnitTest" :
>> org.jboss.soa.esb.ConfigurationException:
>> org.jboss.soa.esb.listeners.gateway.remotestrategies.RemoteFileSystemS 
>> trategyException:
>> org.jboss.soa.esb.listeners.gateway.remotestrategies.cache.FtpFileCach 
>> eException:
>> org.jgroups.ChannelException: failed to start protocol stack
>>      [java] [junit]     at
>> org.jboss.soa.esb.listeners.gateway.ReadOnlyRemoteGatewayListener.crea 
>> teRemoteFileSystemStrategy(ReadOnlyRemoteGatewayListener.java:222)
>> (See start of thread for full details)
>>
>> It looks like a local env issue and we were just wondering was  
>> there some setup required that we weren't aware of??  As it turns  
>> out, it looks as though the offending tests have been removed, so  
>> it's probably not an issue anymore, unless they need to be readded.
>>
>> T.
>>
>> Mark Little wrote:
>>     
>>> Linux builds have been failing since the 25th of June (that's the  
>>> last email I have, so it may go back further). Hudson builds  
>>> seemed to be working fine after Daniel fixed his target issues. I  
>>> have an email from Hudson on the 25th that says "back to normal".  
>>> I'm assuming "normal" is "build ok", though you can never be too  
>>> sure ;-)
>>>
>>> Mark.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27 Jun 2007, at 11:34, Kevin Conner wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Mark Little wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> BTW, the last failure message I saw from Hudson (last night my  
>>>>> time), it
>>>>> failed on the FTP integration test.
>>>>>           
>>>> Sorry, I've missed most of this.  Do we still have an issue with the
>>>> build or is that what we are trying to work out?
>>>>
>>>>  Kev
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
>>>> Street, Windsor, Berkshire,
>>>> SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
>>>> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David
>>>> Owens (Ireland)
>>>>         
>>> ----
>>>
>>> Mark Little
>>> mlittle at redhat.com
>>>
>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111  
>>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire,
>>> SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
>>> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and  
>>> David Owens (Ireland)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> esb-dev mailing list
>>> esb-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/esb-dev
>>>
>>>       
>> -- 
>> Red Hat:
>> Registered Address: Red Hat Ltd, Brian O' Donnell and Partners, 62  
>> Merrion Square, Dublin 2, Ireland.
>> Registered in the Companies Registration Office, Parnell House, 14  
>> Parnell Square, Dublin 1, Ireland, at No. 304873
>> Directors: Charlie Peters (USA), Michael Cunningham (USA). David  
>> Owens, Brendan Lane
>>     
>
> ----
>
> Mark Little
> mlittle at redhat.com
>
> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod  
> Street, Windsor, Berkshire,
> SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David  
> Owens (Ireland)
>
>
>
>
>
>   

-- 
Red Hat:
Registered Address: Red Hat Ltd, Brian O' Donnell and Partners, 62 Merrion Square, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Registered in the Companies Registration Office, Parnell House, 14 Parnell Square, Dublin 1, Ireland, at No. 304873
Directors: Charlie Peters (USA), Michael Cunningham (USA). David Owens, Brendan Lane


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.