[esb-dev] message.getBody().setContents(some object) is deprecated

[Mark Little]

Pop

Ouch!


On 17 May 2007, at 15:43, Tom Fennelly wrote:

> Please get someone to record that one for us (with sound) ;-)
>
> Mark Little wrote:
>> I'll also stick a broom up my a*se and sweep the floor too.
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> Mark.
>>
>>
>> On 17 May 2007, at 15:37, Tom Fennelly wrote:
>>
>>> While your at that, perhaps we should provide hard examples of  
>>> why/when one would attach objects to Message.Attachment Vs  
>>> Message.Body.  From the position of someone just using the API  
>>> (Vs the author), these classes look as though they do pretty much  
>>> the same thing.
>>>
>>> T.
>>>
>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>> Maybe the javadoc too then?
>>>>
>>>> Mark Little wrote:
>>>>> I'm going to update the manual then, because it's obviously as  
>>>>> clear as mud ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17 May 2007, at 15:02, Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah that's helps :).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah what I'm after is that there need to be a way to get the  
>>>>>> whole thing. Sometimes you have no clue what's been set, so there
>>>>>> should be way to "Get me the whole thing".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --K
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark Little wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 17 May 2007, at 14:49, Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There has been a lot of confusion on how to set the body  
>>>>>>>> object(s), and
>>>>>>>> I think that we should get the word out that the
>>>>>>>> 'right' way of doing this is to use:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> message.getBody().add(Body.DEFAULT_NAME, your object)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no single "right" way. This is a default/ 
>>>>>>> convenience. The way it's supposed to happen is that the  
>>>>>>> endpoints agree (via the contract definition) where in the  
>>>>>>> body specific contents go (what names, for example).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> add(Object o) // <-- no parameter, is just for lazy  
>>>>>>> developers ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The thing I don't really understand is why getByteArray does  
>>>>>>>> not stream
>>>>>>>> all the objects into the ByteArray? I guess I don't really  
>>>>>>>> understand
>>>>>>>> why we have the "_content" in addition to it; taken from the  
>>>>>>>> BodyImpl class:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because that's the definition of getByteArray. It's not meant  
>>>>>>> to be the entire contents of the message, just a byte array  
>>>>>>> for anything that wasn't an Object, e.g., a stream in for  
>>>>>>> bytes, get a stream out of bytes. But not mutually exclusive  
>>>>>>> to the named objects, attachments etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What you're after would probably be: getBodyAsByteArray
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mark.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> public BodyImpl()
>>>>>>>>     {
>>>>>>>>         _content = null;
>>>>>>>>         _objects = new Hashtable<String, Object>();
>>>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thx,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> esb-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> esb-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:esb-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/esb-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mark Little
>>>>>>> mlittle at redhat.com <mailto:mlittle at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
>>>>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111  
>>>>>>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.  
>>>>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No.  
>>>>>>> 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters  
>>>>>>> (USA) and David Owens (Ireland)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark Little
>>>>> mlittle at redhat.com <mailto:mlittle at redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
>>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111  
>>>>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.  
>>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No.  
>>>>> 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters  
>>>>> (USA) and David Owens (Ireland)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>> -----
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> esb-dev mailing list
>>>> esb-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:esb-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/esb-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Red Hat:
>>> Registered Address: Red Hat Ltd, Brian O' Donnell and Partners,  
>>> 62 Merrion Square, Dublin 2, Ireland.
>>> Registered in the Companies Registration Office, Parnell House,  
>>> 14 Parnell Square, Dublin 1, Ireland, at No. 304873
>>> Directors: Charlie Peters (USA), Michael Cunningham (USA). David  
>>> Owens, Brendan Lane
>>>
>>
>> ----
>>
>> Mark Little
>> mlittle at redhat.com <mailto:mlittle at redhat.com>
>>
>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111  
>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.  
>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903  
>> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and  
>> David Owens (Ireland)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Red Hat:
> Registered Address: Red Hat Ltd, Brian O' Donnell and Partners, 62  
> Merrion Square, Dublin 2, Ireland.
> Registered in the Companies Registration Office, Parnell House, 14  
> Parnell Square, Dublin 1, Ireland, at No. 304873
> Directors: Charlie Peters (USA), Michael Cunningham (USA). David  
> Owens, Brendan Lane
>

----

Mark Little
mlittle at redhat.com

JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod  
Street, Windsor, Berkshire,
SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David  
Owens (Ireland)




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/esb-dev/attachments/20070517/de4d88e8/attachment.html