[esb-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Assigned: (JBESB-452) Refactor Notifiers
Mark Little (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Sat Jun 23 10:28:52 EDT 2007
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-452?page=all ]
Mark Little reassigned JBESB-452:
---------------------------------
Assignee: Daniel Bevenius (was: Mark Little)
> Refactor Notifiers
> ------------------
>
> Key: JBESB-452
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-452
> Project: JBoss ESB
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Rosetta
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Environment: any
> Reporter: Kurt Stam
> Assigned To: Daniel Bevenius
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 4.2
>
> Time Spent: 4 hours
> Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
>
> These comments are based on the JMS notifiers but will probably apply to the other notifiers as well:
> 1. The notifiers should be more like listeners where you get one (or more instances). Until they get recycled when there is a config change. Right now the JMS onces
> connected and disconnect with every message, which causes stress on the JMS provider when running in high load mode.
> 2. They should get their 'provider' configuration from the configuration, just like the listeners. Right now you cannot connect to other JMS providers.
> 3. The notifiers should get hooked up to the same life cycle management as the listener infrastructure.
> In other words: They really should be 'inverse gateways', the model is broken and there shouldn't be a distinction between notifying and sending a message via couriers+listeners. The fact we support different transports (and in different ways) for notifiers than for the "core" ESB is just wrong.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the esb-issues
mailing list