[exo-jcr-commits] exo-jcr SVN: r1822 - jcr/trunk/exo.jcr.component.core/src/main/java/org/exoplatform/services/jcr/impl/dataflow/persistent/jbosscache.

[do-not-reply at jboss.org]

Author: nzamosenchuk
Date: 2010-02-15 09:11:20 -0500 (Mon, 15 Feb 2010)
New Revision: 1822

Modified:
   jcr/trunk/exo.jcr.component.core/src/main/java/org/exoplatform/services/jcr/impl/dataflow/persistent/jbosscache/ParentNodeEvictionActionPolicy.java
Log:
EXOJCR-507: Fix committed. Need to use PEEK instead of getNode

Modified: jcr/trunk/exo.jcr.component.core/src/main/java/org/exoplatform/services/jcr/impl/dataflow/persistent/jbosscache/ParentNodeEvictionActionPolicy.java
===================================================================
--- jcr/trunk/exo.jcr.component.core/src/main/java/org/exoplatform/services/jcr/impl/dataflow/persistent/jbosscache/ParentNodeEvictionActionPolicy.java	2010-02-15 11:22:21 UTC (rev 1821)
+++ jcr/trunk/exo.jcr.component.core/src/main/java/org/exoplatform/services/jcr/impl/dataflow/persistent/jbosscache/ParentNodeEvictionActionPolicy.java	2010-02-15 14:11:20 UTC (rev 1822)
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
             
             // We use the method getChildrenNamesDirect to avoid going through 
             // the interceptor chain (EXOJCR-460)
-            Set<Object> names = ((CacheSPI)cache).getNode(parentFqn).getChildrenNamesDirect();
+            Set<Object> names = ((CacheSPI)cache).peek(parentFqn, false).getChildrenNamesDirect();
             if (names.isEmpty() || (names.size() == 1 && names.contains(fqn.get(2))))
             {
                if (log.isTraceEnabled())