[forge-dev] JBoss Maven Java EE 6

Dan Allen dan.j.allen at gmail.com
Fri Jun 1 04:16:30 EDT 2012


Nope, that's what we are already using. We could upgrade to 3.0.0.Final, or
better yet give the user the choice.

Note that there is still a bug in the specs that require an exclusion to
use with Arquillian (works fine for compilation).

<dependency>
    <groupId>org.jboss.spec</groupId>
    <artifactId>jboss-javaee-6.0</artifactId>
    <version>3.0.0.Final</version>
    <type>pom</type>
    <scope>provided</scope>
    <exclusions>
        <exclusion>
            <groupId>org.apache.xalan</groupId>
            <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
        </exclusion>
    </exclusions>
</dependency>

This isn't a problem if you are just using the spec bom to import
dependency versions (scope = import).

-Dan

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Look what I found today:
>
> http://planet.jboss.org/post/jboss_maven_java_ee_6_specification_apis
>
> Is there a change with respect to the current situation with the maven
> dependencies? Should we do anything in Forge?
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>


-- 
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120601/a5784a9e/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the forge-dev mailing list