[forge-dev] Running/Building on Windows
Ryan Bradley
rbradley at redhat.com
Tue Mar 20 09:00:16 EDT 2012
I get the same ugliness in Linux as well (using 64-bit Fedora 15).
Also, by implementing 'java.io.Serializable' instead of just
'Serializable', it means that the 'import java.io.Serializable' causes a
warning, which should be very easy to avoid.
On 03/20/2012 06:31 AM, Koen Aers wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> The same ugliness can be admired also on OSX...
> But I believe I saw an issue for it.
>
> Cheers,
> Koen
>
> Op 20-mrt.-2012, om 10:23 heeft Ivan St. Ivanov het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> My opinion on this (unfortunately didn't have the time to express it
>> in the other thread):
>>
>> OK, we'll fix the test. But thus we'll just close our eyes. Here is why.
>>
>> An entity generated by Forge looks on Windows like this:
>>
>> package com.test.entity;
>> // Some imports go here
>> // below is the last import, and not only
>> import java.lang.Override;@Entity public class Employee implements
>> java.io.Serializable {
>>
>> Do you see how everything is on one line? It's ugly. And I believe
>> that this happens just on Windows. And I think that the test makes
>> sure that this is avoided.
>>
>> So if we "fix" the test to just pass, we'll keep living with this.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III
>> <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com <mailto:lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, we should definitely resolve this. I think by fixing the
>> test case.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov
>> <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com <mailto:ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Koen,
>>
>> You are not alone. :-(
>>
>> You may check this recent discussion:
>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/2012-March/001705.html
>>
>>
>> Do you have the same problem?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ivan
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Koen Aers
>> <koen.aers at gmail.com <mailto:koen.aers at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Some of you probably think: 'Here we go again' ;-)
>>
>> While working on FORGE-489 I had to extensively test on
>> Windows as I had to modify the startup scripts. I tested
>> on Windows XP and Windows 7 and found that, while Forge
>> builds fine if the tests are skipped, doing 'mvn clean
>> install' fails while running the tests for the
>> Parser/Java module in both cases. Is this a known issue
>> that I somehow missed?
>>
>> I also encountered some glitches while running on both
>> those platforms. I found that tab completion not always
>> seems to work and that commands sometimes are echoed.
>> Anyone has the same experiences?
>>
>> Unless somebody tells me that I've overlooked something,
>> I will file the JIRA's with some more details tomorrow...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Koen
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>> http://ocpsoft.org <http://ocpsoft.org/>
>> "Simpler is better."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120320/1753000a/attachment-0001.html
More information about the forge-dev
mailing list