[forge-dev] Running/Building on Windows

Ryan Bradley rbradley at redhat.com
Tue Mar 20 09:00:16 EDT 2012


I get the same ugliness in Linux as well (using 64-bit Fedora 15).  
Also, by implementing 'java.io.Serializable' instead of just 
'Serializable', it means that the 'import java.io.Serializable' causes a 
warning, which should be very easy to avoid.

On 03/20/2012 06:31 AM, Koen Aers wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> The same ugliness can be admired also on OSX...
> But I believe I saw an issue for it.
>
> Cheers,
> Koen
>
> Op 20-mrt.-2012, om 10:23 heeft Ivan St. Ivanov het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> My opinion on this (unfortunately didn't have the time to express it 
>> in the other thread):
>>
>> OK, we'll fix the test. But thus we'll just close our eyes. Here is why.
>>
>> An entity generated by Forge looks on Windows like this:
>>
>> package com.test.entity;
>> // Some imports go here
>> // below is the last import, and not only
>> import java.lang.Override;@Entity public class Employee implements 
>> java.io.Serializable {
>>
>> Do you see how everything is on one line? It's ugly. And I believe 
>> that this happens just on Windows. And I think that the test makes 
>> sure that this is avoided.
>>
>> So if we "fix" the test to just pass, we'll keep living with this.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III 
>> <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com <mailto:lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Yes, we should definitely resolve this. I think by fixing the
>>     test case.
>>
>>
>>     On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov
>>     <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com <mailto:ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Koen,
>>
>>         You are not alone. :-(
>>
>>         You may check this recent discussion:
>>         http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/2012-March/001705.html
>>
>>
>>         Do you have the same problem?
>>
>>         Regards,
>>         Ivan
>>
>>         On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Koen Aers
>>         <koen.aers at gmail.com <mailto:koen.aers at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             Some of you probably think: 'Here we go again' ;-)
>>
>>             While working on FORGE-489 I had to extensively test on
>>             Windows as I had to modify the startup scripts. I tested
>>             on Windows XP and Windows 7 and found that, while Forge
>>             builds fine if the tests are skipped, doing 'mvn clean
>>             install' fails while running the tests for the
>>             Parser/Java module in both cases. Is this a known issue
>>             that I somehow missed?
>>
>>             I also encountered some glitches while running on both
>>             those platforms. I found that tab completion not always
>>             seems to work and that commands sometimes are echoed.
>>             Anyone has the same experiences?
>>
>>             Unless somebody tells me that I've overlooked something,
>>             I will file the JIRA's with some more details tomorrow...
>>
>>             Cheers,
>>             Koen
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             forge-dev mailing list
>>             forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>             https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         forge-dev mailing list
>>         forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Lincoln Baxter, III
>>     http://ocpsoft.org <http://ocpsoft.org/>
>>     "Simpler is better."
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     forge-dev mailing list
>>     forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120320/1753000a/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the forge-dev mailing list