[forge-dev] Running/Building on Windows

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

Yeah. I've been meaning to check out that serialized thing for a while.
Regarding the formatting. Sounds like something we should fix. Proposals
welcome!

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ryan Bradley <rbradley at redhat.com> wrote:

>  I get the same ugliness in Linux as well (using 64-bit Fedora 15).  Also,
> by implementing 'java.io.Serializable' instead of just 'Serializable', it
> means that the 'import java.io.Serializable' causes a warning, which should
> be very easy to avoid.
>
>
> On 03/20/2012 06:31 AM, Koen Aers wrote:
>
> Hi Ivan,
>
>  The same ugliness can be admired also on OSX…
> But I believe I saw an issue for it.
>
>  Cheers,
> Koen
>
>  Op 20-mrt.-2012, om 10:23 heeft Ivan St. Ivanov het volgende geschreven:
>
>  Hi!
>
>  My opinion on this (unfortunately didn't have the time to express it in
> the other thread):
>
>  OK, we'll fix the test. But thus we'll just close our eyes. Here is why.
>
>  An entity generated by Forge looks on Windows like this:
>
>  package com.test.entity;
> // Some imports go here
> // below is the last import, and not only
> import java.lang.Override;@Entity public class Employee implements
> java.io.Serializable {
>
>  Do you see how everything is on one line? It's ugly. And I believe that
> this happens just on Windows. And I think that the test makes sure that
> this is avoided.
>
>  So if we "fix" the test to just pass, we'll keep living with this.
>
>  Regards,
> Ivan
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
> lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, we should definitely resolve this. I think by fixing the test case.
>>
>>
>>  On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov <
>> ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Koen,
>>>
>>>  You are not alone. :-(
>>>
>>>  You may check this recent discussion:
>>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/2012-March/001705.html
>>>
>>>  Do you have the same problem?
>>>
>>>  Regards,
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Koen Aers <koen.aers at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some of you probably think: 'Here we go again' ;-)
>>>>
>>>> While working on FORGE-489 I had to extensively test on Windows as I
>>>> had to modify the startup scripts. I tested on Windows XP and Windows 7 and
>>>> found that, while Forge builds fine if the tests are skipped, doing 'mvn
>>>> clean install' fails while running the tests for the Parser/Java module in
>>>> both cases. Is this a known issue that I somehow missed?
>>>>
>>>> I also encountered some glitches while running on both those platforms.
>>>> I found that tab completion not always seems to work and that commands
>>>> sometimes are echoed. Anyone has the same experiences?
>>>>
>>>> Unless somebody tells me that I've overlooked something, I will file
>>>> the JIRA's with some more details tomorrow...
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Koen
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>> http://ocpsoft.org
>> "Simpler is better."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>  _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing listforge-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>


-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120320/920c5daa/attachment.html