[forge-dev] Forge License

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

For clarification, Forge is currently LGPL :)

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:29 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi at gmail.com>wrote:

> Absolutely ! Feel free to add anything related to it on the issue.
>
> Regards,
>
> George Gastaldi
>
> 2012/5/24 Jason Porter <lightguard.jp at gmail.com>:
> > I think those interested would want to know pros / cons in laymen's
> terms. Could we have that in the JIRA?
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On May 24, 2012, at 13:23, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >>
> >> Dan Allen, Lincoln and I were discussing about moving Forge license to
> >> EPL (Eclipse) instead of the current Apache one.
> >> What are your thoughts about it? Glad if you could post your comments
> >> on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-580
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> George Gastaldi
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> forge-dev mailing list
> >> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120526/4f704514/attachment.html