[forge-dev] questions about wildcard import [FORGE-367 - FORGE-563 - FORGE-424]

Lincoln Baxter, III lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
Fri Oct 26 10:10:26 EDT 2012


I may be a bit ignorant about Jandex. But what is a FlowerIndex? ;) Lol.

~Lincoln

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:08 PM, JFlower <fiorenzino at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> i created this jira: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-699
>
> my code: https://github.com/fiorenzino/jandex/tree/FORGE-699
>
> Comments are always welcome!!
>
> Fiorenzo
>
> ps: my first jandex hacking https://gist.github.com/3956397
>
> *numbers: 66 libraries - scanned in 1458 milliseconds - 15036 classes
> (with subclasses)*
>
>
>
> 2012/10/24 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com>
>
> Responses inline..
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 7:38 PM, JFlower <fiorenzino at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i started to find material to solve the bugs in object.
>>>
>>> *1) (FORGE-367) [SOLVED] question: how add import with wildcard and/or
>>> static:*
>>>
>>> see my comment:
>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-367#comment-12728726
>>>
>>> In this version we accept wildcard inside the className and we accept
>>> static option:
>>> *- javaClass.addImport("org.junit.Assert.*").setStatic(true);*
>>>
>>
>> I like the way you have solved this.
>>
>>>
>>> If you want we could add a new method:
>>> *- javaClass.addStaticImport("org.junit.Assert.*");*
>>>
>>
>> No, I don't think this is necessary. We should be able to make the right
>> decision.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> *2) (FORGE-563 - FORGE-424) question: creation of
>>> some WildcardImportResolver implementation* - where this resolver
>>> should find the complete className when we have some wildcard import?
>>>
>>
>> That's the tricky part.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> - Could we use the current ClassLoader and find all classes in that?
>>>
>>>
>> Well... the problem is that we can't use the Current classloader because
>> that would be Forge's classloader. We need the classloader of the project,
>> which is not actually classloaded, so we would need to classload the
>> project (potentially very slow without an index.)
>>
>>
>>> - Could we create some index with all classes inside all mvn
>>> dependencies/modules jar [using jboss module capabilities?
>>> using tattletale? ]
>>>
>>> We need to do *something* - I'll leave it up to you to play with some
>> ideas and see what works well or not!
>>
>>
>>> - Could we* *use jboss jandex to do that (also if jandex is processes
>>> Java annotations)?
>>> http://javahowto.blogspot.de/2012/08/how-to-run-jboss-jandex.html
>>>
>>> https://github.com/jbossas/jandex/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jboss/jandex/JarIndexer.java
>>>
>>>
>>> Potentially.
>>
>>
>>> Have you some idea?
>>>
>>> Nothing you haven't already mentioned :)
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Fiorenzo
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lincoln Baxter, III
>> http://ocpsoft.org
>> "Simpler is better."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>


-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20121026/c43aa4d6/attachment.html 


More information about the forge-dev mailing list