From adamwyl92 at gmail.com Fri Aug 1 06:47:05 2014 From: adamwyl92 at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QWRhbSBXecWCdWRh?=) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:47:05 +0200 Subject: [forge-dev] IntelliJ Forge plugin pre-release In-Reply-To: References: <1995F2EB-BF99-4459-B76F-F6DE4E223191@redhat.com> Message-ID: Hi Max, Thanks for the suggestion, I have added few screenshots to the plugin page in repository. As George said, at the moment there is only a GUI support. I will be focusing on shell integration after implementing few features and fixing all issues there. 2014-08-01 2:32 GMT+02:00 George Gastaldi : > I am preparing a video about this plugin. Had to find how to change IDEA > to use JDK1.7 on Mac first (it's in the info.plist file inside the package > btw). > > There isn't a console support yet, but IDEA has a Terminal window that > allows you to run the console version natively. Therefore some of the > commands that exist in eclipse (cd #/) and the linked editors do not exist. > > > Em 31/07/2014, ?s 19:26, "Max Rydahl Andersen" > escreveu: > > > >> On 31 Jul 2014, at 15:51, Adam Wy?uda wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> For anyone interested in IntelliJ-Forge integration progress, it is > >> now > >> possible to test the pre-release version of the plugin. > >> > >> To install the plugin, go to IntelliJ Settings -> Plugins -> Browse > >> Repositories and search for JBoss Forge IDEA Plugin. To start > >> interacting > >> with Forge press Ctrl+Alt+4. > >> > >> Plugin can be also downloaded from: > >> http://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/7515 > >> > >> I'd be more than happy to hear your feedback! > > > > really cool - maybe add a page somewhere with some screenshots and > > examples of > > what can be done ? > > > > also just because i'm curious - how is the feature comparison with this > > plugin for intellij > > vs eclipse plugin ? > > > > Does it have a console, suport for cd #/, "linked editors" etc. or is > > currently purely > > what corresponds to Ctrl+4 in eclipse ? > > > > /max > > http://about.me/maxandersen > > _______________________________________________ > > forge-dev mailing list > > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20140801/c6e5b52c/attachment.html From ggastald at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 11:30:42 2014 From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 12:30:42 -0300 Subject: [forge-dev] Forge meeting minutes - 2014-08-06 Message-ID: <53E24A22.9050304@redhat.com> ============== #forge Meeting ============== Meeting started by gastaldi at 15:00:53 UTC. The full logs are available at http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/forge/2014/forge.2014-08-06-15.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Agenda (gastaldi, 15:01:41) * JBDS status (lincolnthree1, 15:04:36) * Okay, well keep up the great work George. Thank you for doing so much and making this happen! (lincolnthree1, 15:16:14) * Latest features (lincolnthree1, 15:20:56) * Archetype generation and catalog support! (lincolnthree1, 15:21:06) * Great job gastaldi! (lincolnthree1, 15:21:16) * Build issues (gastaldi, 15:26:07) * gastaldi will get in touch with ivannov about the Windows issues he found and work with him to get fixed in the next release (gastaldi, 15:27:40) Meeting ended at 15:29:49 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * gastaldi (44) * lincolnthree1 (21) * jbossbot (12) * vineetreynolds (8) * jbott (8) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot From ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com Fri Aug 8 08:12:01 2014 From: ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com (Ivan St. Ivanov) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 15:12:01 +0300 Subject: [forge-dev] Running the build on Windows In-Reply-To: <786AB487-275C-4C14-A2C9-89F4D6B15B3B@redhat.com> References:

<11D87593-4856-407A-A1EF-AEB37976B254@redhat.com> <2361F9A9-6E94-4F1F-B889-11448DFE7699@redhat.com> <786AB487-275C-4C14-A2C9-89F4D6B15B3B@redhat.com> Message-ID: Hi everybody, Sorry for the whole week without news from me, I was in vacation and didn't want to touch a computer ;) So, I updated the JDK on my windows box to the latest version. And now the JVM error while running the javaee build is gone. However, it failed with a timeout in calling a javassist proxy. Usually on Windows tests run extremely slowly, so I believe that the test would run fine if it was a bit faster. I will send you later (today or tomorrow) the exact stack trace. BTW, which issue is more important? The text addon fix or the JUnit test command? Regards, Ivan On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:36 PM, George Gastaldi wrote: > Right, sounds good. > > Thanks for the help, you are awesome! :) > > George > > Em 31/07/2014, ?s 12:54, "Ivan St. Ivanov" > escreveu: > > George, I didn't mean tests at all here. > > I meant that whenever you want to use the text addon to parse something > for you, you will have troubles on Windows, because the RegEx patterns in > the productive code do not work on Windows. And the tests are there to > prove that, not to be ignored by us. > > I will create the JIRA issue and will assign it to me. I guess it has > higher prio than JUnit command. > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:32 PM, George Gastaldi > wrote: > >> Hey Ivan, >> >> When you refer to the "whole text addon is broken" you mean the Scanner >> tests or the Inflector too? I ask this because the Inflector tests pass in >> my local box. >> >> Em 31/07/2014, ?s 09:55, "Ivan St. Ivanov" >> escreveu: >> >> George, I think that it is not the test that do not work on Windows, but >> the whole text addon is broken. I mean, the patterns that rely on \n are >> there. I fixed easily the YAML patterns, but I stuck in the Groovy ones - >> too few knowledge in RegExp :) >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:46 PM, George Gastaldi >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ivan, >>> >>> That would be good if the fix is trivial. Otherwise we can add an >>> Assume.assumeFalse(OperatingSystemUtils.isWindows()); in a @Before method >>> in the scanner tests. >>> >>> >>> Em 31/07/2014, ?s 09:32, "Ivan St. Ivanov" >>> escreveu: >>> >>> Hey George, >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> What do you think, should we fix the text issues on Windows? I think >>> yes. If you agree with me, I will at least create a JIRA for that. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ivan >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:23 PM, George Gastaldi >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Ivan, >>>> >>>> Good catch! You're the man! >>>> >>>> In my previous attempt to find out what the problem was, I had to >>>> ignore the text addon tests on Windows to proceed. >>>> >>>> The JVM crash is reported in JIRA also, I think Antonio Goncalves >>>> experienced something like that. >>>> >>>> Let me know if you find somehing else. >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> George >>>> >>>> Em 31/07/2014, ?s 08:28, "Ivan St. Ivanov" >>>> escreveu: >>>> >>>> Hey Daniel, >>>> >>>> The idea of this effort is just to make sure Forge tests run locally on >>>> Windows. And then to investigate why the central build fails. I.e. first >>>> clean up your own garden and only then look in the public park ;) >>>> >>>> If you have any special issues with Aesh, please share them (probably >>>> in another thread). I also had some, but I thought they were resolved. The >>>> thing is that I don't use Windows at home any more (switched to Fedora), so >>>> I can't catch problems with the rate I used to do before ;) >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Ivan >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Cunha >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Ivan, >>>>> >>>>> I don't know if aesh work ok on windows. In my last test I had many >>>>> problem and that can be the answer about forge don't run ok on windows. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov < >>>>> ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey everybody, >>>>>> >>>>>> As we discussed yesterday, a promised to run the build locally on my >>>>>> Windows computer to see if we have any issues there, fix them and only then >>>>>> address the failing builds on the build server. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did that, and I have the following observations: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) The text addon tests failed, mostly because the patterns that >>>>>> recognize the different language elements for YAML, Groovy, JavaScript and >>>>>> HTML are built with the assumption that the end of line character is \n. >>>>>> You know, on Windows it is \r\n. So there were some tests failures. I >>>>>> decided to fix them and only then to continue. But after it took me more >>>>>> than two hours debugging and trying without much progress (fixed only YAML >>>>>> and most of the Groovy) I gave up. I then cloned the repo with git's >>>>>> autocrlf set to false and the tests passed. Nevertheless, we should fix >>>>>> these I guess, if we want our text addon to work on Windows >>>>>> >>>>>> 2) The JavaEE addon failed with a JVM crash (I attached the generated >>>>>> dump files from the three runs that I did). I tried to run it both as part >>>>>> of the build of the whole Forge core, as well as individually. In both >>>>>> cases it failed. I will install a newer version of the JDK and will try >>>>>> again. >>>>>> >>>>>> That is for the moment from my side. Unfortunately I spent all the >>>>>> time debugging the text addon, so didn't spend any effort on the JUnit >>>>>> command and no email for utility methods so far from me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Ivan >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Daniel Cunha (soro) >>>>> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br >>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ >>>>> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro >>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> forge-dev mailing list >>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> forge-dev mailing list >>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> forge-dev mailing list >> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> forge-dev mailing list >> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20140808/8a0f6fb8/attachment-0001.html From ggastald at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 09:03:21 2014 From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 09:03:21 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [forge-dev] Running the build on Windows In-Reply-To: References:

<11D87593-4856-407A-A1EF-AEB37976B254@redhat.com> <2361F9A9-6E94-4F1F-B889-11448DFE7699@redhat.com> <786AB487-275C-4C14-A2C9-89F4D6B15B3B@redhat.com> Message-ID: Hey Ivan, Seeing that the Windows build in our CI always fail because of this I believe that fixing the text addon may be a better choice. Thanks, George > Em 08/08/2014, ?s 09:12, "Ivan St. Ivanov" escreveu: > > Hi everybody, > > Sorry for the whole week without news from me, I was in vacation and didn't want to touch a computer ;) > > So, I updated the JDK on my windows box to the latest version. And now the JVM error while running the javaee build is gone. However, it failed with a timeout in calling a javassist proxy. Usually on Windows tests run extremely slowly, so I believe that the test would run fine if it was a bit faster. I will send you later (today or tomorrow) the exact stack trace. > > BTW, which issue is more important? The text addon fix or the JUnit test command? > > Regards, > Ivan > > >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:36 PM, George Gastaldi wrote: >> Right, sounds good. >> >> Thanks for the help, you are awesome! :) >> >> George >> >>> Em 31/07/2014, ?s 12:54, "Ivan St. Ivanov" escreveu: >>> >>> George, I didn't mean tests at all here. >>> >>> I meant that whenever you want to use the text addon to parse something for you, you will have troubles on Windows, because the RegEx patterns in the productive code do not work on Windows. And the tests are there to prove that, not to be ignored by us. >>> >>> I will create the JIRA issue and will assign it to me. I guess it has higher prio than JUnit command. >>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:32 PM, George Gastaldi wrote: >>>> Hey Ivan, >>>> >>>> When you refer to the "whole text addon is broken" you mean the Scanner tests or the Inflector too? I ask this because the Inflector tests pass in my local box. >>>> >>>>> Em 31/07/2014, ?s 09:55, "Ivan St. Ivanov" escreveu: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> George, I think that it is not the test that do not work on Windows, but the whole text addon is broken. I mean, the patterns that rely on \n are there. I fixed easily the YAML patterns, but I stuck in the Groovy ones - too few knowledge in RegExp :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:46 PM, George Gastaldi wrote: >>>>>> Hi Ivan, >>>>>> >>>>>> That would be good if the fix is trivial. Otherwise we can add an Assume.assumeFalse(OperatingSystemUtils.isWindows()); in a @Before method in the scanner tests. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Em 31/07/2014, ?s 09:32, "Ivan St. Ivanov" escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey George, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you think, should we fix the text issues on Windows? I think yes. If you agree with me, I will at least create a JIRA for that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Ivan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:23 PM, George Gastaldi wrote: >>>>>>>> Hey Ivan, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Good catch! You're the man! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In my previous attempt to find out what the problem was, I had to ignore the text addon tests on Windows to proceed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The JVM crash is reported in JIRA also, I think Antonio Goncalves experienced something like that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let me know if you find somehing else. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> George >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Em 31/07/2014, ?s 08:28, "Ivan St. Ivanov" escreveu: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey Daniel, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The idea of this effort is just to make sure Forge tests run locally on Windows. And then to investigate why the central build fails. I.e. first clean up your own garden and only then look in the public park ;) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If you have any special issues with Aesh, please share them (probably in another thread). I also had some, but I thought they were resolved. The thing is that I don't use Windows at home any more (switched to Fedora), so I can't catch problems with the rate I used to do before ;) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Ivan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Cunha wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi Ivan, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't know if aesh work ok on windows. In my last test I had many problem and that can be the answer about forge don't run ok on windows. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hey everybody, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As we discussed yesterday, a promised to run the build locally on my Windows computer to see if we have any issues there, fix them and only then address the failing builds on the build server. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I did that, and I have the following observations: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) The text addon tests failed, mostly because the patterns that recognize the different language elements for YAML, Groovy, JavaScript and HTML are built with the assumption that the end of line character is \n. You know, on Windows it is \r\n. So there were some tests failures. I decided to fix them and only then to continue. But after it took me more than two hours debugging and trying without much progress (fixed only YAML and most of the Groovy) I gave up. I then cloned the repo with git's autocrlf set to false and the tests passed. Nevertheless, we should fix these I guess, if we want our text addon to work on Windows >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) The JavaEE addon failed with a JVM crash (I attached the generated dump files from the three runs that I did). I tried to run it both as part of the build of the whole Forge core, as well as individually. In both cases it failed. I will install a newer version of the JDK and will try again. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That is for the moment from my side. Unfortunately I spent all the time debugging the text addon, so didn't spend any effort on the JUnit command and no email for utility methods so far from me. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> Ivan >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Daniel Cunha (soro) >>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br >>>>>>>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ >>>>>>>>>> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro >>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> forge-dev mailing list >>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> forge-dev mailing list >> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20140808/5613c501/attachment-0001.html From ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com Sun Aug 10 16:09:17 2014 From: ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com (Ivan St. Ivanov) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:09:17 +0300 Subject: [forge-dev] Running the build on Windows In-Reply-To: References:

<11D87593-4856-407A-A1EF-AEB37976B254@redhat.com> <2361F9A9-6E94-4F1F-B889-11448DFE7699@redhat.com> <786AB487-275C-4C14-A2C9-89F4D6B15B3B@redhat.com>

Message-ID: Hi again, As promised, this is the output of the test that failed. As I already wrote, it actually broke with a timeout, as you might guess from the output. I am working now on fixing the text addon. However, it takes some time, as I am not experienced in debugging state machines that calculate their state based on pattern matching ;) Cheers, Ivan On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:03 PM, George Gastaldi wrote: > Hey Ivan, > > Seeing that the Windows build in our CI always fail because of this I > believe that fixing the text addon may be a better choice. > > Thanks, > > George > > Em 08/08/2014, ?s 09:12, "Ivan St. Ivanov" > escreveu: > > Hi everybody, > > Sorry for the whole week without news from me, I was in vacation and > didn't want to touch a computer ;) > > So, I updated the JDK on my windows box to the latest version. And now the > JVM error while running the javaee build is gone. However, it failed with a > timeout in calling a javassist proxy. Usually on Windows tests run > extremely slowly, so I believe that the test would run fine if it was a bit > faster. I will send you later (today or tomorrow) the exact stack trace. > > BTW, which issue is more important? The text addon fix or the JUnit test > command? > > Regards, > Ivan > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:36 PM, George Gastaldi > wrote: > >> Right, sounds good. >> >> Thanks for the help, you are awesome! :) >> >> George >> >> Em 31/07/2014, ?s 12:54, "Ivan St. Ivanov" >> escreveu: >> >> George, I didn't mean tests at all here. >> >> I meant that whenever you want to use the text addon to parse something >> for you, you will have troubles on Windows, because the RegEx patterns in >> the productive code do not work on Windows. And the tests are there to >> prove that, not to be ignored by us. >> >> I will create the JIRA issue and will assign it to me. I guess it has >> higher prio than JUnit command. >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:32 PM, George Gastaldi >> wrote: >> >>> Hey Ivan, >>> >>> When you refer to the "whole text addon is broken" you mean the Scanner >>> tests or the Inflector too? I ask this because the Inflector tests pass in >>> my local box. >>> >>> Em 31/07/2014, ?s 09:55, "Ivan St. Ivanov" >>> escreveu: >>> >>> George, I think that it is not the test that do not work on Windows, but >>> the whole text addon is broken. I mean, the patterns that rely on \n are >>> there. I fixed easily the YAML patterns, but I stuck in the Groovy ones - >>> too few knowledge in RegExp :) >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:46 PM, George Gastaldi >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ivan, >>>> >>>> That would be good if the fix is trivial. Otherwise we can add an >>>> Assume.assumeFalse(OperatingSystemUtils.isWindows()); in a @Before method >>>> in the scanner tests. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em 31/07/2014, ?s 09:32, "Ivan St. Ivanov" >>>> escreveu: >>>> >>>> Hey George, >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> What do you think, should we fix the text issues on Windows? I think >>>> yes. If you agree with me, I will at least create a JIRA for that. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ivan >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:23 PM, George Gastaldi >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey Ivan, >>>>> >>>>> Good catch! You're the man! >>>>> >>>>> In my previous attempt to find out what the problem was, I had to >>>>> ignore the text addon tests on Windows to proceed. >>>>> >>>>> The JVM crash is reported in JIRA also, I think Antonio Goncalves >>>>> experienced something like that. >>>>> >>>>> Let me know if you find somehing else. >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> >>>>> George >>>>> >>>>> Em 31/07/2014, ?s 08:28, "Ivan St. Ivanov" >>>>> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>> Hey Daniel, >>>>> >>>>> The idea of this effort is just to make sure Forge tests run locally >>>>> on Windows. And then to investigate why the central build fails. I.e. first >>>>> clean up your own garden and only then look in the public park ;) >>>>> >>>>> If you have any special issues with Aesh, please share them (probably >>>>> in another thread). I also had some, but I thought they were resolved. The >>>>> thing is that I don't use Windows at home any more (switched to Fedora), so >>>>> I can't catch problems with the rate I used to do before ;) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Ivan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Cunha >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Ivan, >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know if aesh work ok on windows. In my last test I had many >>>>>> problem and that can be the answer about forge don't run ok on windows. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov < >>>>>> ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey everybody, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As we discussed yesterday, a promised to run the build locally on my >>>>>>> Windows computer to see if we have any issues there, fix them and only then >>>>>>> address the failing builds on the build server. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did that, and I have the following observations: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1) The text addon tests failed, mostly because the patterns that >>>>>>> recognize the different language elements for YAML, Groovy, JavaScript and >>>>>>> HTML are built with the assumption that the end of line character is \n. >>>>>>> You know, on Windows it is \r\n. So there were some tests failures. I >>>>>>> decided to fix them and only then to continue. But after it took me more >>>>>>> than two hours debugging and trying without much progress (fixed only YAML >>>>>>> and most of the Groovy) I gave up. I then cloned the repo with git's >>>>>>> autocrlf set to false and the tests passed. Nevertheless, we should fix >>>>>>> these I guess, if we want our text addon to work on Windows >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2) The JavaEE addon failed with a JVM crash (I attached the >>>>>>> generated dump files from the three runs that I did). I tried to run it >>>>>>> both as part of the build of the whole Forge core, as well as individually. >>>>>>> In both cases it failed. I will install a newer version of the JDK and will >>>>>>> try again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That is for the moment from my side. Unfortunately I spent all the >>>>>>> time debugging the text addon, so didn't spend any effort on the JUnit >>>>>>> command and no email for utility methods so far from me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Ivan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Daniel Cunha (soro) >>>>>> Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br >>>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ >>>>>> GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro >>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> forge-dev mailing list >>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> forge-dev mailing list >>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> forge-dev mailing list >>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> forge-dev mailing list >> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> forge-dev mailing list >> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20140810/09ddcdc8/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- Aug 02, 2014 3:39:23 PM org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.WeldStartup startContainer INFO: WELD-000101: Transactional services not available. Injection of @Inject UserTransaction not available. Transactional observers will be invoked synchronously. Aug 02, 2014 3:39:23 PM org.jboss.weld.event.ExtensionObserverMethodImpl checkRequiredTypeAnnotations WARN: WELD-000411: Observer method [BackedAnnotatedMethod] public org.jboss.forge.addon.ui.impl.extension.AnnotatedCommandExtension.observeAnnotationMethods(@Observes ProcessAnnotatedType