[forge-dev] Obtaining project name in persistence provider

[Ivan St. Ivanov]

Ah, now I found this MetadataFacet. Is it always available? I see that it
uses the Maven facet under the hood.


On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov
<ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>wrote:

> I think it was possible to do that in Forge 1?
>
> BTW, how do you get a project name from the Project object? Is it through
> the Maven facet? Do we always have that on a project?
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:06 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> I'd rather pass as a param than injecting tbh. This allows the object to
>> be reused as a singleton without aby thread issues.
>>
>> Btw Project is not yet available for injection. Should we create a JIRA
>> for it?
>>
>> Em 25/01/2014, às 20:02, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
>> escreveu:
>>
>> OK, but what does the JavaEEDefaultProvider::configure method do? It
>> produces the content of persistence.xml. Why would you need Project object
>> to pollute the interface if it's used in just one of the implementations?
>> And we can even do without it, as you noted.
>>
>> When I asked this question in the first message of this thread, I was
>> thinking of somehow injecting the project, not changing the interface.
>>
>> But if you say it's reasonable, I will do that, it's not a big deal.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:00 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>wrote:
>>
>>> However since we are on CR1, and other requirements may appear, perhaps
>>> it's wise to change the interface definition now than later. :)
>>>
>>> Em 25/01/2014, às 18:58, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
>>> escreveu:
>>>
>>> Thanks, George!
>>>
>>> As I am not really keen to change the interface definition, I would do
>>> it as you proposed: without the project name.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:52 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Ivan,
>>>> You could change the configure method signature to pass the project as
>>>> a parameter, but remember that it may be null.
>>>>
>>>> However, I think it would be better to not add the projectName to the
>>>> DDL file in order to keep it simple and easier to find.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> George Gastaldi
>>>>
>>>> Em 25/01/2014, às 18:42, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
>>>> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> I am working on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1443. It's not a
>>>> big deal, it's a matter of adding a few lines to the JavaEEDefaultProvider
>>>> class.
>>>>
>>>> One of the requirements is that the create and drop scripts should bear
>>>> the name of the project: <projectName>Creade.ddl and <projectName>Drop.ddl.
>>>> I wonder is there a way to pass that somehow to the persistence provider?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ivan
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20140126/261f59a6/attachment.html