[forge-dev] Roaster on Forge bom ?

[George Gastaldi]

On second thought, I think this is not a good idea. You should depend on the parser-java addon and that is already in the BOM.

Em 29/03/2014, às 15:00, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com> escreveu:

> Yes, that would be a good idea. Want to submit a pull-request?
> 
>> Em 29/03/2014, às 14:27, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing at gmail.com> escreveu:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I was writing some samples with Roaster and I was wondering if it would make sense to have the Roaster artifacts defined in the Forge BOM ? As a developer it would make my life easier, but then I don't know if you want to tie Forge and Roaster now.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Antonio Goncalves 
>> Software architect and Java Champion
>> 
>> Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20140329/38eaf8a8/attachment.html