[forge-dev] Command test in a [non-core] addon

George Gastaldi ggastald at redhat.com
Sat Aug 15 15:42:17 EDT 2015


I think the solution in your case is to remove the provided scope from your
addons.

Here is where this is better explained :
https://github.com/forge/core/blob/master/README.asciidoc#what-scope-should-my-addon-dependencies-be

Best Regards,

George Gastaldi
Em 15/08/2015 16:28, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi folks,
>
> I am now working on a test of the Spring Boot addon setup command. I was
> really happy with the changes that you did in the Forge test infrastructure
> that allow avoiding listing all the addons that my command depends on in
> the @AddonDependencies annotation as well as repeating some of them in the
> deployment method body. I was finally able to write tests like that
> <https://github.com/forge/core/blob/master/javaee/tests/src/test/java/org/jboss/forge/addon/javaee/security/ui/AbstractSecurityCommandTest.java>
> :
>
> @Deployment
> @AddonDependencies
> public static AddonArchive getDeployment()
> {
>    return ShrinkWrap
>             .create(AddonArchive.class)
>             .addBeansXML()
>             .addClass(ProjectHelper.class)
>             .addClass(AbstractSecurityCommandTest.class);
> }
>
> So I tried the same thing with the Spring Boot addon
> <https://github.com/bgjug/spring-boot-forge-addon> that we started
> developing in our JUG. However the test failed. I have attached both the
> test and the whole log file. I will here just paste the exception that
> stands out:
>
> Caused by: java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: when
> resolving overridden method
> "org.jboss.forge.addon.springboot.ui.SpringBootSetupCommand.getProjectFactory()Lorg/jboss/forge/addon/projects/ProjectFactory;"
> the class loader (instance of org/jboss/modules/ModuleClassLoader) of the
> current class, org/jboss/forge/addon/springboot/ui/SpringBootSetupCommand,
> and its superclass loader (instance of
> org/jboss/modules/ModuleClassLoader), have different Class objects for the
> type
> tupCommand.getProjectFactory()Lorg/jboss/forge/addon/projects/ProjectFactory;
> used in the signature
> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2615)
> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods(Class.java:1860)
> at java.lang.Class.getEnclosingMethod(Class.java:937)
> at
> org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.Reflections.isNonStaticInnerClass(Reflections.java:401)
> at
> org.jboss.weld.util.Beans.isTypeManagedBeanOrDecoratorOrInterceptor(Beans.java:492)
> at
> org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.BeanDeployer.createClassBean(BeanDeployer.java:213)
> at
> org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.BeanDeployer.createClassBeans(BeanDeployer.java:191)
> at
> org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.BeanDeployment.createBeans(BeanDeployment.java:262)
> at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.WeldStartup.deployBeans(WeldStartup.java:373)
> at
> org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.WeldBootstrap.deployBeans(WeldBootstrap.java:83)
> at org.jboss.weld.environment.se.Weld.initialize(Weld.java:134)
> at
> org.jboss.forge.furnace.container.cdi.lifecycle.WeldAddonLifecycleProvider.start(WeldAddonLifecycleProvider.java:77)
> at
> org.jboss.forge.furnace.impl.addons.AddonRunnable$2.call(AddonRunnable.java:92)
> at
> org.jboss.forge.furnace.impl.addons.AddonRunnable$2.call(AddonRunnable.java:86)
> at
> org.jboss.forge.furnace.util.ClassLoaders.executeIn(ClassLoaders.java:42)
> at
> org.jboss.forge.furnace.impl.addons.AddonRunnable.run(AddonRunnable.java:85)
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>
> What I see different between the spring boot addon and the java ee addon,
> where the referenced test belongs to, is that our addon has its pom.xml
> dependencies in *provided* scope.
>
> Is that the possible cause? Would you please give us advise how to write
> tests outside the core addons?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Ivan
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20150815/c3336c0d/attachment.html 


More information about the forge-dev mailing list