[forge-dev] JDK 8

[Ivan St. Ivanov]

Hi Geroge,

That's wonderful! Finally we can rewrite all those anonymous inner classes
with lambdas. And use streams. And sometimes Optional in the APIs :)

Do you plan to remove this from the root pom:

<plugin>
   <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
   <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
   <configuration>
      <argLine>-Xms256m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m</argLine>
   </configuration>
</plugin>

It doesn't make sense anymore. But has been bugging me all the time when I
try to build Forge with Java 9 (it's an error there).

Cheers,
Ivan


On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree with that! :)
>
> +1 for Java 8.
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:23 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Forge users,
>>
>> For the next minor release, I'd like to make JDK8 the minimum requirement.
>>
>> The JBoss Tools team is already using JDK8 as the minimum requirement for
>> their new versions. We are already running our build in JDK8 (with sources
>> set to 1.7 still)
>>
>> Is there any objection? Say it now or forever hold your peace, because
>> the Forge train never stops ;)
>>
>> Best Regards, love you all!
>>
>> George Gastaldi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Cunha (soro)
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20151007/fdaa68ed/attachment.html