[forge-dev] Suggestions for reusing InputComponent's setup

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

I like this suggestion. I think supporting both the Factory and Injection
point are necessary.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:55 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Antonio Goncalves pointed out in
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2331 (also in
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2469) that some input
> configurations could be reused.
> For example, the targetPackage although is used in several commands, is
> initialized differently on some commands.
>
> What would you think it would be a nice strategy to reuse
> UIInputComponents?
>
> Based on Antonio's suggestions, I have elaborated 2 proposals:
>
> 1) Introduce specializations of UIInput:
>
> Eg: @Inject private TargetPackage targetPackage;  (Where TargetPackage
> extends UIInput<String>)
>
> More info here:https://gist.github.com/gastaldi/46b3f38bc38c5efcc0ba
>
> 2)  Move the component creation to utility classes:
>
> eg: @Inject InputFactory factory;
> and in the initializeUI of the UICommand:
>
> targetPackage = factory.createTargetPackage(builder) ;
>
> Of course, we could have a mix of both, but I would like to know your
> thoughts about each proposal.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> --
> *George Gastaldi | Senior Software Engineer*
>
> JBoss Forge Team
> T: +55 11 3524-6169
> M: +55 47 9711-1000
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20150904/150b9a90/attachment.html