From ggastald at redhat.com  Fri Jul 21 01:10:07 2017
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 02:10:07 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Running Furnace (Forge container) in a flat classloader
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJh+sqVZW6GE-YVSdQebo7g4nBQ8-eSubitjs51=4-mFjw@mail.gmail.com>

Hey all!

For those interested in running Forge in a flat classloader, using CDI in
its full potential (including Interceptors and Decorators), I created a
project that may help you[1].

It is basically an implementation of the Furnace API that exposes the
services provided by addons that use the simple-container using a CDI
extension. Addons that depend on the CDI container are already
CDI-friendly, so expect no changes in this project when loading those
addons.

It may save you some memory by not starting several Weld instances and it's
really fast. Give it a try if you like!

[1] https://github.com/gastaldi/furnace-embedded

Best Regards,



George Gastaldi

Principal Software Engineer

Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>

Remote

Joinville - Santa Catarina

ggastald at redhat.com    M: +55-47-99711-1000
<https://red.ht/sig>
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
@redhatnews <https://twitter.com/redhatnews>   Red Hat
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>   Red Hat
<https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>

From ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com  Fri Jul 21 05:07:22 2017
From: ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com (Ivan St. Ivanov)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:07:22 +0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Running Furnace (Forge container) in a flat
	classloader
In-Reply-To: <CAMmsnJh+sqVZW6GE-YVSdQebo7g4nBQ8-eSubitjs51=4-mFjw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJh+sqVZW6GE-YVSdQebo7g4nBQ8-eSubitjs51=4-mFjw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACYLA9FYdAyHDtOfu2Kuww1_zO1S7HkDK31+TOOicK1CQhDJpQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi George,

If I got it right, that's really awesome! No, no, let me put it in another
way: that's amazing!!! :)

Let me try and explain what I got.

If I add dependency in my project to furnace-embedded and to Forge BOM (or
whichever project that exports maven addons, i.e. commands), I will be able
to call those addons/commands programmatically form my project.

That is, I can use the simple container to look up e.g. the create project
command and run it, configuring it with the "input" like the UI does. And
this will create a new project for me without running Forge as a separate
process. Right?

Cheers,
Ivan

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:10 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hey all!
>
> For those interested in running Forge in a flat classloader, using CDI in
> its full potential (including Interceptors and Decorators), I created a
> project that may help you[1].
>
> It is basically an implementation of the Furnace API that exposes the
> services provided by addons that use the simple-container using a CDI
> extension. Addons that depend on the CDI container are already
> CDI-friendly, so expect no changes in this project when loading those
> addons.
>
> It may save you some memory by not starting several Weld instances and
> it's really fast. Give it a try if you like!
>
> [1] https://github.com/gastaldi/furnace-embedded
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> George Gastaldi
>
> Principal Software Engineer
>
> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
>
> Remote
>
> Joinville - Santa Catarina
>
> ggastald at redhat.com    M: +55-47-99711-1000
> <https://red.ht/sig>
> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
> @redhatnews <https://twitter.com/redhatnews>   Red Hat
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>   Red Hat
> <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
>
>

From ggastald at redhat.com  Fri Jul 21 10:40:42 2017
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:40:42 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Running Furnace (Forge container) in a flat
	classloader
In-Reply-To: <CACYLA9FYdAyHDtOfu2Kuww1_zO1S7HkDK31+TOOicK1CQhDJpQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJh+sqVZW6GE-YVSdQebo7g4nBQ8-eSubitjs51=4-mFjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9FYdAyHDtOfu2Kuww1_zO1S7HkDK31+TOOicK1CQhDJpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJh9cwDN7QQi_ZksDcFDN44vJk2y4FvwNOEbdRGZhjVapQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ivan,

You can already do that with https://github.com/forge/forge-service. Forge
doesn't fork into another process (since Forge 2.0.0.Final was released :))

The only difference is that furnace-embedded will run in a single Weld
instance, which may be a good thing when you run Forge inside a WAR or when
you don't need a modular classpath.


Em 21 de jul de 2017 06:07, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
escreveu:

Hi George,

If I got it right, that's really awesome! No, no, let me put it in another
way: that's amazing!!! :)

Let me try and explain what I got.

If I add dependency in my project to furnace-embedded and to Forge BOM (or
whichever project that exports maven addons, i.e. commands), I will be able
to call those addons/commands programmatically form my project.

That is, I can use the simple container to look up e.g. the create project
command and run it, configuring it with the "input" like the UI does. And
this will create a new project for me without running Forge as a separate
process. Right?

Cheers,
Ivan

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:10 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hey all!
>
> For those interested in running Forge in a flat classloader, using CDI in
> its full potential (including Interceptors and Decorators), I created a
> project that may help you[1].
>
> It is basically an implementation of the Furnace API that exposes the
> services provided by addons that use the simple-container using a CDI
> extension. Addons that depend on the CDI container are already
> CDI-friendly, so expect no changes in this project when loading those
> addons.
>
> It may save you some memory by not starting several Weld instances and
> it's really fast. Give it a try if you like!
>
> [1] https://github.com/gastaldi/furnace-embedded
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> George Gastaldi
>
> Principal Software Engineer
>
> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
>
> Remote
>
> Joinville - Santa Catarina
>
> ggastald at redhat.com    M: +55-47-99711-1000
> <https://red.ht/sig>
> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
> @redhatnews <https://twitter.com/redhatnews>   Red Hat
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>   Red Hat
> <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
>
>
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

From ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com  Fri Jul 21 13:08:16 2017
From: ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com (Ivan St. Ivanov)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 20:08:16 +0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Running Furnace (Forge container) in a flat
	classloader
In-Reply-To: <CAMmsnJh9cwDN7QQi_ZksDcFDN44vJk2y4FvwNOEbdRGZhjVapQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJh+sqVZW6GE-YVSdQebo7g4nBQ8-eSubitjs51=4-mFjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9FYdAyHDtOfu2Kuww1_zO1S7HkDK31+TOOicK1CQhDJpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJh9cwDN7QQi_ZksDcFDN44vJk2y4FvwNOEbdRGZhjVapQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACYLA9HpVzbeT1GaGVW2W_oXN4QhqrGeubnYaFFCHNHJoVB7Rg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi George,

I already tried the service. And still there I need to run it as a separate
application (by e.g. launching Wildfly Swarm).

So I think I got it right that furnace embedded does that, but inside your
own monolith ;)

Awesome! Great work!

Cheers,
Ivan

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:40 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hi Ivan,
>
> You can already do that with https://github.com/forge/forge-service. Forge
> doesn't fork into another process (since Forge 2.0.0.Final was released :))
>
> The only difference is that furnace-embedded will run in a single Weld
> instance, which may be a good thing when you run Forge inside a WAR or when
> you don't need a modular classpath.
>
>
> Em 21 de jul de 2017 06:07, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
> Hi George,
>
> If I got it right, that's really awesome! No, no, let me put it in another
> way: that's amazing!!! :)
>
> Let me try and explain what I got.
>
> If I add dependency in my project to furnace-embedded and to Forge BOM (or
> whichever project that exports maven addons, i.e. commands), I will be able
> to call those addons/commands programmatically form my project.
>
> That is, I can use the simple container to look up e.g. the create project
> command and run it, configuring it with the "input" like the UI does. And
> this will create a new project for me without running Forge as a separate
> process. Right?
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:10 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all!
> >
> > For those interested in running Forge in a flat classloader, using CDI in
> > its full potential (including Interceptors and Decorators), I created a
> > project that may help you[1].
> >
> > It is basically an implementation of the Furnace API that exposes the
> > services provided by addons that use the simple-container using a CDI
> > extension. Addons that depend on the CDI container are already
> > CDI-friendly, so expect no changes in this project when loading those
> > addons.
> >
> > It may save you some memory by not starting several Weld instances and
> > it's really fast. Give it a try if you like!
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/gastaldi/furnace-embedded
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > George Gastaldi
> >
> > Principal Software Engineer
> >
> > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
> >
> > Remote
> >
> > Joinville - Santa Catarina
> >
> > ggastald at redhat.com    M: +55-47-99711-1000
> > <https://red.ht/sig>
> > TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
> > @redhatnews <https://twitter.com/redhatnews>   Red Hat
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>   Red Hat
> > <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>

From lincolnbaxter at gmail.com  Thu Jul 27 17:08:26 2017
From: lincolnbaxter at gmail.com (Lincoln Baxter, III)
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:08:26 -0400
Subject: [forge-dev] Running Furnace (Forge container) in a flat
	classloader
In-Reply-To: <CACYLA9HpVzbeT1GaGVW2W_oXN4QhqrGeubnYaFFCHNHJoVB7Rg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJh+sqVZW6GE-YVSdQebo7g4nBQ8-eSubitjs51=4-mFjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9FYdAyHDtOfu2Kuww1_zO1S7HkDK31+TOOicK1CQhDJpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJh9cwDN7QQi_ZksDcFDN44vJk2y4FvwNOEbdRGZhjVapQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9HpVzbeT1GaGVW2W_oXN4QhqrGeubnYaFFCHNHJoVB7Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEp_U4EM3puZ6OXj5a87cNQRCNvZwO-ohjO6L=s9t7e1Xv8wnw@mail.gmail.com>

This is really awesome, George! Definitely another milestone in Forge's
"write once, run everywhere" philosophy! You are amazing :)

Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi George,
>
> I already tried the service. And still there I need to run it as a separate
> application (by e.g. launching Wildfly Swarm).
>
> So I think I got it right that furnace embedded does that, but inside your
> own monolith ;)
>
> Awesome! Great work!
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:40 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ivan,
> >
> > You can already do that with https://github.com/forge/forge-service.
> Forge
> > doesn't fork into another process (since Forge 2.0.0.Final was released
> :))
> >
> > The only difference is that furnace-embedded will run in a single Weld
> > instance, which may be a good thing when you run Forge inside a WAR or
> when
> > you don't need a modular classpath.
> >
> >
> > Em 21 de jul de 2017 06:07, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
> > escreveu:
> >
> > Hi George,
> >
> > If I got it right, that's really awesome! No, no, let me put it in
> another
> > way: that's amazing!!! :)
> >
> > Let me try and explain what I got.
> >
> > If I add dependency in my project to furnace-embedded and to Forge BOM
> (or
> > whichever project that exports maven addons, i.e. commands), I will be
> able
> > to call those addons/commands programmatically form my project.
> >
> > That is, I can use the simple container to look up e.g. the create
> project
> > command and run it, configuring it with the "input" like the UI does. And
> > this will create a new project for me without running Forge as a separate
> > process. Right?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ivan
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:10 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all!
> > >
> > > For those interested in running Forge in a flat classloader, using CDI
> in
> > > its full potential (including Interceptors and Decorators), I created a
> > > project that may help you[1].
> > >
> > > It is basically an implementation of the Furnace API that exposes the
> > > services provided by addons that use the simple-container using a CDI
> > > extension. Addons that depend on the CDI container are already
> > > CDI-friendly, so expect no changes in this project when loading those
> > > addons.
> > >
> > > It may save you some memory by not starting several Weld instances and
> > > it's really fast. Give it a try if you like!
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/gastaldi/furnace-embedded
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > George Gastaldi
> > >
> > > Principal Software Engineer
> > >
> > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
> > >
> > > Remote
> > >
> > > Joinville - Santa Catarina
> > >
> > > ggastald at redhat.com    M: +55-47-99711-1000
> > > <https://red.ht/sig>
> > > TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
> > > @redhatnews <https://twitter.com/redhatnews>   Red Hat
> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>   Red Hat
> > > <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>

From alr at redhat.com  Thu Jul 27 23:40:00 2017
From: alr at redhat.com (Andrew Lee Rubinger)
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 23:40:00 -0400
Subject: [forge-dev] Running Furnace (Forge container) in a flat
	classloader
In-Reply-To: <CAEp_U4EM3puZ6OXj5a87cNQRCNvZwO-ohjO6L=s9t7e1Xv8wnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJh+sqVZW6GE-YVSdQebo7g4nBQ8-eSubitjs51=4-mFjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9FYdAyHDtOfu2Kuww1_zO1S7HkDK31+TOOicK1CQhDJpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJh9cwDN7QQi_ZksDcFDN44vJk2y4FvwNOEbdRGZhjVapQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9HpVzbeT1GaGVW2W_oXN4QhqrGeubnYaFFCHNHJoVB7Rg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEp_U4EM3puZ6OXj5a87cNQRCNvZwO-ohjO6L=s9t7e1Xv8wnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABm567E4ZaFpJOqmxMysc8s_fV_yfjw0OmYH67Mx28g9_eaODw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is really awesome, George! Definitely another milestone in Forge's
> "write once, run everywhere" philosophy! You are amazing :)
>

Oh my gosh, George woke a ghost.  That's how awesome he is.

S,
ALR


>
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi George,
> >
> > I already tried the service. And still there I need to run it as a
> separate
> > application (by e.g. launching Wildfly Swarm).
> >
> > So I think I got it right that furnace embedded does that, but inside
> your
> > own monolith ;)
> >
> > Awesome! Great work!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ivan
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:40 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ivan,
> > >
> > > You can already do that with https://github.com/forge/forge-service.
> > Forge
> > > doesn't fork into another process (since Forge 2.0.0.Final was released
> > :))
> > >
> > > The only difference is that furnace-embedded will run in a single Weld
> > > instance, which may be a good thing when you run Forge inside a WAR or
> > when
> > > you don't need a modular classpath.
> > >
> > >
> > > Em 21 de jul de 2017 06:07, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <
> ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
> > > escreveu:
> > >
> > > Hi George,
> > >
> > > If I got it right, that's really awesome! No, no, let me put it in
> > another
> > > way: that's amazing!!! :)
> > >
> > > Let me try and explain what I got.
> > >
> > > If I add dependency in my project to furnace-embedded and to Forge BOM
> > (or
> > > whichever project that exports maven addons, i.e. commands), I will be
> > able
> > > to call those addons/commands programmatically form my project.
> > >
> > > That is, I can use the simple container to look up e.g. the create
> > project
> > > command and run it, configuring it with the "input" like the UI does.
> And
> > > this will create a new project for me without running Forge as a
> separate
> > > process. Right?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Ivan
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:10 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all!
> > > >
> > > > For those interested in running Forge in a flat classloader, using
> CDI
> > in
> > > > its full potential (including Interceptors and Decorators), I
> created a
> > > > project that may help you[1].
> > > >
> > > > It is basically an implementation of the Furnace API that exposes the
> > > > services provided by addons that use the simple-container using a CDI
> > > > extension. Addons that depend on the CDI container are already
> > > > CDI-friendly, so expect no changes in this project when loading those
> > > > addons.
> > > >
> > > > It may save you some memory by not starting several Weld instances
> and
> > > > it's really fast. Give it a try if you like!
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/gastaldi/furnace-embedded
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > George Gastaldi
> > > >
> > > > Principal Software Engineer
> > > >
> > > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > Remote
> > > >
> > > > Joinville - Santa Catarina
> > > >
> > > > ggastald at redhat.com    M: +55-47-99711-1000
> > > > <https://red.ht/sig>
> > > > TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
> > > > @redhatnews <https://twitter.com/redhatnews>   Red Hat
> > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>   Red Hat
> > > > <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > forge-dev mailing list
> > > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > forge-dev mailing list
> > > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>



-- 
Twitter: @ALRubinger

From ggastald at redhat.com  Fri Jul 28 00:01:16 2017
From: ggastald at redhat.com (George Gastaldi)
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 01:01:16 -0300
Subject: [forge-dev] Running Furnace (Forge container) in a flat
	classloader
In-Reply-To: <CAEp_U4EM3puZ6OXj5a87cNQRCNvZwO-ohjO6L=s9t7e1Xv8wnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJh+sqVZW6GE-YVSdQebo7g4nBQ8-eSubitjs51=4-mFjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9FYdAyHDtOfu2Kuww1_zO1S7HkDK31+TOOicK1CQhDJpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMmsnJh9cwDN7QQi_ZksDcFDN44vJk2y4FvwNOEbdRGZhjVapQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACYLA9HpVzbeT1GaGVW2W_oXN4QhqrGeubnYaFFCHNHJoVB7Rg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEp_U4EM3puZ6OXj5a87cNQRCNvZwO-ohjO6L=s9t7e1Xv8wnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMmsnJgveCo=nm3aV3aebgJnCq03wzCSkCr6FmcxM1ue_4Aerw@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks! And I have released a 1.0.0.Alpha1 in maven central, so people can
try it right away :)

Best Regards,



George Gastaldi

Principal Software Engineer

Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>

Remote

Joinville - Santa Catarina

ggastald at redhat.com    M: +55-47-99711-1000
<https://red.ht/sig>
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
@redhatnews <https://twitter.com/redhatnews>   Red Hat
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>   Red Hat
<https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>


On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is really awesome, George! Definitely another milestone in Forge's
> "write once, run everywhere" philosophy! You are amazing :)
>
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi George,
> >
> > I already tried the service. And still there I need to run it as a
> separate
> > application (by e.g. launching Wildfly Swarm).
> >
> > So I think I got it right that furnace embedded does that, but inside
> your
> > own monolith ;)
> >
> > Awesome! Great work!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ivan
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:40 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ivan,
> > >
> > > You can already do that with https://github.com/forge/forge-service.
> > Forge
> > > doesn't fork into another process (since Forge 2.0.0.Final was released
> > :))
> > >
> > > The only difference is that furnace-embedded will run in a single Weld
> > > instance, which may be a good thing when you run Forge inside a WAR or
> > when
> > > you don't need a modular classpath.
> > >
> > >
> > > Em 21 de jul de 2017 06:07, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <
> ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>
> > > escreveu:
> > >
> > > Hi George,
> > >
> > > If I got it right, that's really awesome! No, no, let me put it in
> > another
> > > way: that's amazing!!! :)
> > >
> > > Let me try and explain what I got.
> > >
> > > If I add dependency in my project to furnace-embedded and to Forge BOM
> > (or
> > > whichever project that exports maven addons, i.e. commands), I will be
> > able
> > > to call those addons/commands programmatically form my project.
> > >
> > > That is, I can use the simple container to look up e.g. the create
> > project
> > > command and run it, configuring it with the "input" like the UI does.
> And
> > > this will create a new project for me without running Forge as a
> separate
> > > process. Right?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Ivan
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:10 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all!
> > > >
> > > > For those interested in running Forge in a flat classloader, using
> CDI
> > in
> > > > its full potential (including Interceptors and Decorators), I
> created a
> > > > project that may help you[1].
> > > >
> > > > It is basically an implementation of the Furnace API that exposes the
> > > > services provided by addons that use the simple-container using a CDI
> > > > extension. Addons that depend on the CDI container are already
> > > > CDI-friendly, so expect no changes in this project when loading those
> > > > addons.
> > > >
> > > > It may save you some memory by not starting several Weld instances
> and
> > > > it's really fast. Give it a try if you like!
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/gastaldi/furnace-embedded
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > George Gastaldi
> > > >
> > > > Principal Software Engineer
> > > >
> > > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > Remote
> > > >
> > > > Joinville - Santa Catarina
> > > >
> > > > ggastald at redhat.com    M: +55-47-99711-1000
> > > > <https://red.ht/sig>
> > > > TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
> > > > @redhatnews <https://twitter.com/redhatnews>   Red Hat
> > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>   Red Hat
> > > > <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > forge-dev mailing list
> > > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > forge-dev mailing list
> > > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>

From jsightle at redhat.com  Fri Jul 28 14:14:03 2017
From: jsightle at redhat.com (Jess Sightler)
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:14:03 -0400
Subject: [forge-dev] Running Furnace (Forge container) in a flat
	classloader
In-Reply-To: <CAMmsnJh+sqVZW6GE-YVSdQebo7g4nBQ8-eSubitjs51=4-mFjw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMmsnJh+sqVZW6GE-YVSdQebo7g4nBQ8-eSubitjs51=4-mFjw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALZFT7E+QVbGS_V51CpxJB-xnUibApyBw+UW2SBfu95mLb4z-w@mail.gmail.com>

That is great news. I look forward to trying it with the Windup project.

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:10 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hey all!
>
> For those interested in running Forge in a flat classloader, using CDI in
> its full potential (including Interceptors and Decorators), I created a
> project that may help you[1].
>
> It is basically an implementation of the Furnace API that exposes the
> services provided by addons that use the simple-container using a CDI
> extension. Addons that depend on the CDI container are already
> CDI-friendly, so expect no changes in this project when loading those
> addons.
>
> It may save you some memory by not starting several Weld instances and it's
> really fast. Give it a try if you like!
>
> [1] https://github.com/gastaldi/furnace-embedded
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> George Gastaldi
>
> Principal Software Engineer
>
> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
>
> Remote
>
> Joinville - Santa Catarina
>
> ggastald at redhat.com    M: +55-47-99711-1000
> <https://red.ht/sig>
> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
> @redhatnews <https://twitter.com/redhatnews>   Red Hat
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat>   Red Hat
> <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>