<p><a href="Http://campfirenow.com">Http://campfirenow.com</a></p>
<p>--<br>
Lincoln Baxter's Droid<br>
<a href="http://ocpsoft.com">http://ocpsoft.com</a><br>
"Keep it Simple"</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jul 12, 2011 4:17 AM, "Koen Aers" <<a href="mailto:koen.aers@gmail.com">koen.aers@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">> Yes, dangerous indeed... You always need to know what you're doing when<br>
> creating software ;-)<br>> <br>> And it's still maybe a better analogy than having to lift a heavy hammer,<br>> work hard and pour a lot of sweat to make your sword sharp ;-)<br>> <br>> But I really think a logo should be very simple which would be the case for<br>
> a simple flame...<br>> <br>> Cheers,<br>> Koen<br>> <br>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Paul Bakker <<a href="http://paul.bakker.nl">paul.bakker.nl</a>@<a href="http://gmail.com">gmail.com</a>>wrote:<br>
> <br>>> But one small mistake and it will burn your project to the ground... ;-)<br>>><br>>><br>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Koen Aers <<a href="mailto:koen.aers@gmail.com">koen.aers@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>>>> A bit late but I'll throw in my ideas as well. I also initially liked the<br>>>> anvil image, but I think we should carefully consider Max's arguments. Also,<br>>>> though Dan's analogy of 'banging out a sword' is nice, I think it is not<br>
>>> something obvious.<br>>>><br>>>> That's why after thinking about it for a while I would be inclined to be<br>>>> in favour of r1v6. But I would actually leave out the hands of Prometheus. I<br>
>>> think a flame is a good logo because it is simple, it relates to a forge<br>>>> well and more in general fire has always been a - dangerous, i admit - tool<br>>>> for people to create all kinds of things. Moreover fire is very agile, you<br>
>>> can carry and use it everywhere.<br>>>><br>>>> My 2 cents,<br>>>> Koen<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen <<br>>>> <a href="mailto:max.andersen@redhat.com">max.andersen@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>>>>> btw. the recognizability factor of the "anvil" is though a big factor.<br>>>>><br>>>>> But wondering how it will look at 64x64/32x32/16x16 icon sizes which is<br>
>>>> what will show up in stuff like eclipse ?<br>>>>><br>>>>> /max<br>>>>><br>>>>> On Jul 12, 2011, at 09:00, Ronald van Kuijk wrote:<br>>>>><br>>>>> > Yes, everything you want with the limitation that<br>
>>>> > - it wil be rigid<br>>>>> > - not flexible (in many ways)<br>>>>> > - not easily modifieable<br>>>>> > - made to last (think horseshoes)<br>>>>> > - ...<br>
>>>> ><br>>>>> > ;-)<br>>>>> ><br>>>>> > Being close to Amsterdam and Antwerp, something like a diamond cutter<br>>>>> > comes to mind :-)<br>>>>> ><br>
>>>> > 2011/7/12, Dan Allen <<a href="mailto:dan.j.allen@gmail.com">dan.j.allen@gmail.com</a>>:<br>>>>> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 17:37, Paul Bakker <<a href="http://paul.bakker.nl">paul.bakker.nl</a>@<a href="http://gmail.com">gmail.com</a>><br>
>>>> wrote:<br>>>>> >><br>>>>> >>> I like the sword analogy, makes sense being a "craftsman" developer.<br>>>>> Not<br>>>>> >>> sure if a sword would fit well in the logo (might get too<br>
>>>> complicated),<br>>>>> >>> but<br>>>>> >>> the idea behind it is perfect :-)<br>>>>> >>><br>>>>> >>> I agree on the lightweight part too. The only thing that should be<br>
>>>> clear<br>>>>> >>> is<br>>>>> >>> that you won't get any lock-in with Forge, but to my opinion a anvil<br>>>>> >>> doesn't<br>>>>> >>> say you do have a lock-in. It also implies Forge is a tool that<br>
>>>> supports<br>>>>> >>> your crafsman work.<br>>>>> >>><br>>>>> >>><br>>>>> >> Exactly. Anvils let you create what you want, the way you want to<br>
>>>> create it<br>>>>> >> :) So indeed.<br>>>>> >><br>>>>> >> -Dan<br>>>>> >><br>>>>> >> --<br>>>>> >> Dan Allen<br>
>>>> >> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>>>>> >> Registered Linux User #231597<br>>>>> >><br>>>>> >> <a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about</a><br>
>>>> >> <a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br>>>>> >> <a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br>>>>> >><br>
>>>> > _______________________________________________<br>>>>> > forge-dev mailing list<br>>>>> > <a href="mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org">forge-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>>>>> > <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev</a><br>
>>>><br>>>>> /max<br>>>>> <a href="http://about.me/maxandersen">http://about.me/maxandersen</a><br>>>>><br>>>>><br>>>>><br>>>>><br>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>> forge-dev mailing list<br>>>>> <a href="mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org">forge-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>>>>> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev</a><br>
>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> _______________________________________________<br>>>> forge-dev mailing list<br>>>> <a href="mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org">forge-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev</a><br>>>><br>>>><br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> forge-dev mailing list<br>>> <a href="mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org">forge-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>>> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev</a><br>
>><br>>><br></div>