<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Well let's just say it is up for future discussion :-)<div><br></div><div>In one set of meetings I referred to "drag car" and "formula 1" - we need to provide both - getting started and staying the crooked course. </div><div><br></div><div>Perhaps that is not all Forge+plug-ins...but it is something I want to keep thinking about.</div><div><br></div><div>F1 - <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97rrME9eQHA">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97rrME9eQHA</a></div><div>Drag - <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDP7Pty8Qnw">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDP7Pty8Qnw</a></div><div><br><div><div>On Apr 4, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Keith Babo wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div><br>On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:<br><br><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">One thing I was planning on discussing with Lincoln and the Forge roadmap is around the idea of "Forge as a 4GL" - at the moment it feels mostly like a static code generator - which has the problem of schema changes. But Forge as a 4GL could be more responsive, almost "runtime" code generation. More like what you get in the Rails world. :-)<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">This is exactly where I hope Forge will *not* go.<br></blockquote><br>Yep. I like Forge a lot for getting up and going. It's quite good at that and there's a clear need for it. IMHO, Forge as a 4GL would be really tough to pull off and would take users' attention off of what Forge is best at. <br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>forge-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org">forge-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>