<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Ah, I see it now. I somehow looked right over that :-)<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/11/2012 10:17 AM, Rafael
Benevides wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:4FFDB541.2060904@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Sorry James,<br>
<br>
<u><i>otherProperties</i></u> was just a way to not write all
those properties that is present in the diagram: type, url,
version, etc<br>
<br>
Please, consider the diagram - and it's properties :) - as a guide
that I'll to generate the yaml file.<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Rafael Benevides | Senior JBoss Consultant
Red Hat Brazil
+55-61-9269-6576
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
</pre>
<br>
Em 11-07-2012 14:02, James Perkins escreveu:
<blockquote cite="mid:4FFDB1B8.7080107@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
The only thing I could think of is if we could also have
otherProperties for each available version. Other than that it
looks great to me.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/11/2012 05:00 AM, Rafael
Benevides wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:4FFD6AE3.4050709@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Yesterday I started to work on this new yaml format and I
tried to capture all requirements that was discussed in this
Thread. The result was the following attached uml diagram.<br>
<br>
I think that's the better way to try comprehending what is
needed and what will be covered. Today (or maybe tomorrow)
I'll convert this idea to an example yaml file that is the
representation of the diagram. <br>
<br>
The closest of the idea is something like similar to:<br>
<br>
<b>bom: </b>&jboss-with-x<br>
name: JBoss With X<br>
description: lorem ipsum<br>
otherProperties: otherValues<br>
availableVersions:<br>
- 1.0.0.Final<br>
- 1.0.1.CR1<br>
<br>
<b>bom:</b> &jboss-with-y<br>
name: JBoss With Y<br>
description: lorem ipsum<br>
otherProperties: otherValues<br>
availableVersions:<br>
- 1.0.0.Final<br>
- 1.0.1.CR1<br>
<br>
<b>runtime:</b> &jbosseap6<br>
version: 6.0<br>
type: EAP<br>
boms: <br>
- *jboss-with-x <br>
- *jboss-with-y <br>
recommendedBOM: *jboss-with-x<br>
<br>
Em 03-07-2012 13:01, Rafael Benevides escreveu:
<blockquote cite="mid:4FF3173C.7010105@redhat.com" type="cite">
<br>
Em 03-07-2012 12:53, James Perkins escreveu: <br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">We could do that as well. <br>
<br>
7.0.1.Final: <br>
properties: <br>
arguments: -logmodule <br>
cli: not-available <br>
</blockquote>
I like this approach. </blockquote>
I like this approach either! <br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat</pre>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat</pre>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>