On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:max.andersen@redhat.com" target="_blank">max.andersen@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">>>> So I just started working on EAP support. <a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-88" target="_blank">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-88</a> opened!<br>
>><br>
>> Oh I was wondering why EAP wasn't supported.<br>
>> Didn't realize the forge openshift install was jboss specific.<br>
><br>
> Yeah, I didn't support any more cartridges than just JBoss, as the focus for Forge is definitely on Java / Java EE projects!<br>
<br>
</div>yeah I get that - for some reason I thought Bill Dc. added more support to the forge tools but that might just have been daydreaming ;)<br clear="all"></blockquote><div><br>That's not my understanding. I get that Forge is focused on Java projects, in particular Maven projects, but I don't think it is--or should be--sharply focused on Java EE. Contributors from Red Hat may be focused on that aspect, so if that was the context then I agree. But there are many community members interested in seeing Forge used outside that scope. We don't want the perception of Forge to get pinned to Java EE, IMO.<br>
<br>-Dan <br></div></div><br>-- <br><div>Dan Allen</div>Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><div><a href="http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen" target="_blank">http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>
<a href="http://mojavelinux.com" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction" target="_blank">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br></div><br>