Since CDI annotations is a requirement, isn't this something we will need? What do you recommend as an alternative? What is it missing that would be a blocker?<br><br>Sorry for all the tough questions :) Thanks for your time!!!<br>
<br>~Lincoln<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Paul Bakker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paul.bakker.nl@gmail.com" target="_blank">paul.bakker.nl@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">It provides several things:<div>-Publish OSGi services using CDI annotations</div><div>-Inject OSGi services in CDI beans using @Inject</div><div>-Inject OSGi APIs such as the bundlecontext using @Inject</div>
<div><br></div><div>Other dependency injection solutions for OSGi (Felix DM, Blueprint, Declarative Services etc.) can already do that using non-cdi annotations. That's why I'm not really pushing on using this CDI bridge, because functionally it doesn't offer anything extra (it's still lacking some important features), and it's not finished yet. </div>
<div>In the future this will be very useful however to close the gap between the Java EE and OSGi programming models.</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Paul</div></font></span><div><div class="h5">
<div><br><div><div>On Oct 15, 2012, at 23:33 , "Lincoln Baxter, III" <<a href="mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com" target="_blank">lincolnbaxter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite">And this provides CDI injection between bundles/exposed services?<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Paul Bakker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paul.bakker.nl@gmail.com" target="_blank">paul.bakker.nl@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div>Definitely try it, it's very cool. Just to make sure you get the right idea, this is a prototype for the OSGI-CDI spec (RFC-192) which is still in early development. It is to be expected that there will be some changes.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Paul</div><div><br></div><br><div><div><div><div>On Oct 15, 2012, at 22:28 , "Lincoln Baxter, III" <<a href="mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com" target="_blank">lincolnbaxter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br></div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>Here is the information about Weld-OSGi.<br><br>Anyone want to try it out?<br><br>~Lincoln<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Lincoln Baxter, III</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com" target="_blank">lincolnbaxter@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
Date: Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 8:48 AM<br>Subject: In Relation To... Not one, two Weld releases - 1.1.10.Final and 1.2.0.Beta1 !!<br>To: Lincoln Baxter III <<a href="mailto:lincolnbaxter@gmail.com" target="_blank">lincolnbaxter@gmail.com</a>><br>
<br><br><p dir="ltr"><a href="http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/NotOneTwoWeldReleases1110FinalAnd120Beta1" target="_blank">http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/NotOneTwoWeldReleases1110FinalAnd120Beta1</a></p><p dir="ltr">---<br>
Lincoln Baxter's Droid<br>
<a href="http://ocpsoft.org/" target="_blank">http://ocpsoft.org</a><br>
"Keep it Simple"</p>
</div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Lincoln Baxter, III<br><a href="http://ocpsoft.org/" target="_blank">http://ocpsoft.org</a><br>"Simpler is better."<br></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>forge-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">forge-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
forge-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">forge-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Lincoln Baxter, III<br><a href="http://ocpsoft.org/" target="_blank">http://ocpsoft.org</a><br>"Simpler is better."<br>
_______________________________________________<br>forge-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">forge-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
forge-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org">forge-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Lincoln Baxter, III<br><a href="http://ocpsoft.org" target="_blank">http://ocpsoft.org</a><br>"Simpler is better."<br>